Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
This is a WORLD Heritage site and should be shown respect as such.
Our country is suffering badly from the current political farce, proceeding with this project will do everlasting damage to the...
Read more
-
The proposed plans are just too damaging to our heritage.
-
I would like to urge all concerned to protect this unique piece of our landscape and not to build a tunnel that will harm it. The most straightforward option to improve the flow of traffic is to widen...
Read more
-
The heritage site of Stonehenge has already been disturbed by tourist facilities. To further destroy its important energetic importance would be a travesty. Please leave well alone any more building...
Read more
-
I object to your proposals on ecological, environmental and archaeological grounds.
-
I would like to suggest two points for consideration...
1. I suggest there should be provision for the A360 to be rerouted from Longbarrow junction along (i) the new A303 across the River Till,...
Read more
-
I do object to this sad proposed spoiling of an incomparable site. I appreciate that much money has already been spent on the present proposal, but future generations will look at this development...
Read more
-
This application is for a road to be built atop an area surrounding an ancient monument which should be considered sacred. These monuments are the U.K.'s heritage. We should not be building or...
Read more
-
I object to the current plan for the A303 around Stonehenge because:
(1) It is not far enough away from the extensive site to not cause irrepairable damage to the site itself, the other areas such as...
Read more
-
As an archaeologists and university lecturer I Am deeply concerned about the irreparable damage that will be done to Stonehenge and the WHS. Already the immensely important site at Black Mead has been...
Read more
-
Totally support the motion.
Unbelievable that this should even be considered.
-
I am deeply concerned and troubled by the whole process. The area in and around Stonehenge has so much rich and vital history yet to be uncovered. I’m concerned that authorities are quite happy to...
Read more
-
Is made on the grounds that the scheme will plough straight through a world heritage site without understanding the context of the wider, unexplored archaeology. It is also a site sacred to me, and...
Read more
-
My concerns about the impact upon a historical and religious site of international importance
-
Stone henge is of such social and historical significance,
That it is offensive to suggest that allowing a tunnel to be excavated underneath it is anything other than an insult.
Protect our...
Read more
-
A monument that has been there for thousands of years and, one hopes, will continue to be there for further thousands of years should not be damaged in any way by the actions of this generation of...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a site of huge importance. Not only to the history of the UK but also to that of the world. This cannot be overstated. The key importance in this is the word "site." It is not simply...
Read more
-
I feel that this Proposal will cause irreparable damage to this World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
Please take on board that...
Read more
-
I am registering my own views on the proposed A303 Stonehenge Expressway .As far as I am concerned, this proposal will result in:
• Irreparable damage to Stonehenge, which is a World Heritage...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an ancient historical sight and as such should be protected from and all damaging actions. Our history cannot be replaced. Digging in under the sight or in the immediate vacinity...
Read more
-
1. The proposals include dualling the A303 through the World Heritage Site of which Stonehenge forms a part, which will cause major damage thereto, as has been underlined by a UNESCO report.
2....
Read more
-
The entire site should be protected and preserved for visitors and for archaeology - a tunnel is far too intrusive expensive and unnecessary
-
Besides the impact on the setting of the ancient Stonehenge Avenue, I am also concerned about the permanent negative effects to Neolithic and Bronze Age cemeteries, to the Blick Mead Mesolithic site,...
Read more
-
It is unbelievable that this investigation is actually going ahead. These historical sites are our heritage and we should be proud to have them in our country. Once any alterations take place it will...
Read more
-
I am concerned about any further damage to black Mead. And I am also concerned with disturbing wild birds in the area. This project should not move forward.
-
This badly conceived scheme has already caused irreplaceable damage to Blick Mead on the WHS. The actual construction will forever destroy its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a...
Read more
-
I strongly believe this planning application to be a very unwise move which will destroy a world heritage site. There are many alternatives which are more acceptable because they will be far less...
Read more
-
Stonehenge has been standing for over 5000 years the table it stands on is fragile if damaged it is beyond repair
The monument has significant meaning for the Pagan community which is the oldest...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the scheme as it stands will lead to irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
-
The proposal is quite inappropriate for such a unique, majestic and irreplaceable site.
Our island's history is embodied in it and should be given priority.
-
I am concerned about damage to vital information to important historical sites. Loss of vision of the stones from the road. Disturbance of rare birds in the location. The landscape has great...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed Stonehenge tunnel because of the irreparable damage to the WHS that will be done. This is an historic part of the British landscape and should not be subjected to unnecessary...
Read more
-
I have known, visited and loved Stonehenge and the since childhood and the A303 always was an important route for my family and myself. The landscape, both ancient and modern, of Salisbury Plain and...
Read more
-
I am absolutely disgusted with your actions, Stonehenge and the surrounding area have a very famous part in English history and Stonehenge and everywhere around that area should be protected and most...
Read more
-
The Council for British Archaeology (Wessex Region) will wish to make representations concerning the impact of the scheme on the settings of known monuments and sites within the Stonehenge World...
Read more
-
Just no!
-
No further damage should be done to the archaeological landscape of Stonehenge.
Future generations would be appalled at those who decided that road widening should be at the expense of England’s most...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a unique part of the landscape of prehistoric Britain. Any works in the area of a world heritage site MUST be done with the utmost sensitivity, not just to the monument, but the wider...
Read more
-
Damage to the World Heritage Site, especially by construction of the tunnel portals
In particular, damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site
Risk of damage to sites, as yet unknown beyond the WHS
No...
Read more
-
1) Damage to World Heritage Site
2) Lack of alternative options
3) Increased traffic noise
-
One of the pleasures of driving is being able to see things like Stonehenge while on route, bypasses and motorways are soulless and joyless I for one want to be able to see Stonehenge from the road.
-
Lack of alternative options in consultation that would not damage the World Heritage Site
Loss of the view from the road and need to pay to see the Stones in future
Disturbance of rare bird...
Read more
-
This will cause irreparable damage to the WHS and its archaeology described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. This entire area should be treated with respect and left untouched.
-
I am concerned about the irreparable damage to a World Heritage Site. I am also concerned about the damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site.
-
I have the following objections to the current plan:
1) There be be damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
2) UNESCO’s...
Read more
-
I cannot believe that, in the 21st century, we are thinking about destroying this world heritage site, a title not lightly given. But not only that, there is a second site that will be disturbed, a...
Read more
-
This construction is already disrupting this world Heritage Landmark. It needs to be halted immediately. Construction machinery has damaged previously un-mapped formations of the Salisbury Plain...
Read more
-
Alternative routes are available to not encroach upon the WHS land
-
The view fom the road is valuable to visitors. The archaeology must be preserved at all costs preferably by no earthmoving by mechanical means.The archaeology around the outlying site must be...
Read more
-
The road works at and around Stonehenge are a damaging and unnecessary intrusion onto the most important archaeological site in Britain and one of the most important sites in the entire world. English...
Read more
-
This is a WORLD heritage site, something for the whole world to marvel at, older than us and with much more to teach us, this should not be jeopardised for the car
-
This intended plan has the potential to cause irreparable damage to a site of great historical significance and value.
-
No bypass
-
I am registering as I am very concerned for the damage that the proposed development will do to the UNESCO world heritage site of Stonehenge and its surroundings.
I am concerned about the...
Read more
-
I feel not enough thought and planning has gone into this and the potential for harm to the site has been greatly enhanced.
-
I am very concerned that the planning for this road, tunnel and roundabouts has not taken into consideration the advise front the world heritage. Any damage to this vulnerable ancient site and the...
Read more
-
My primary concern would be for the irreparable damage to Stonehenge a WHS described by UNESCO's advisor's as a landscape without parallel.
There would also be damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
Stonehenge was given to the nation. The tunnel will prevent the people from seeing Stonehenge unless they pay English Heritage £20. I feel EH have hijacked our national monument for monetary gain....
Read more
-
I'm very concerned about the current plans disturbing this world famous UNESCO site and one of the most famous mesolithic sites in the world. The fact that all expert opinion seems to be being ignored...
Read more
-
I object to this new road way as it will affect the integrity of this World Heritage Site and i understand if this proposed goes ahead then Stonehenge will lose its WHS status.I am also concerned...
Read more
-
Much of the traffic congestion on the A303 is provably caused by traffic slowing so that vehicle occupants can see the monument, and not by the volume of traffic exceeding the capacity of the road or...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the impact that the A303 Stonehenge Expressway will have on this most sensitive World Heritage Site.
-
I am very concerned that the proposed road scheme will cause irreparable damage to one of the most important World Heritage sites and destroy the archeological record in the area.
-
Your proposals will damage irreparably a World Heritage Site, described by UNESCO as a 'landscape without parallel'. It will seriously affect the continuing excavations at the very important Blick...
Read more
-
i totally disagree with this road work proposal i wisited stonehenge this summer and found it to vbe a most beautiful peaceful place .... this would be totally ruined by new roads ... noise pollution...
Read more
-
I am devastated to read of the proposed plans for a tunnel near to Stonehenge. This site is one of the most magnificent sacred sites in the world and it feels a sacrilege that anything be done that...
Read more
-
Ireparable damage to world heritage site , and surrounding sites . Our history lost forever . The fantastic cost , the money could be spent much more wisely
-
This world heritage site needs far, far more protection than the current proposal supports.
I fear that permanent damage will be caused to such a precious and unique World Heritage Site and feel...
Read more
-
I object due to the potential damage of the archaeology and setting, concerns re Blick Mead Mesolithic setting, the loss of view from road as well as the cost to view the Stones.
There will be...
Read more
-
This is a disastrous proposal, in that no other plans for traffic easement are on the table. The plans don't address increased traffic noise, nor do they adequately protect serious matters such as...
Read more
-
The proposal which has now been accepted, does not
(a) protect the World Heritage Site, its archaeology or settings
(b) take into account the objections of the UNESO advisers
(c) consider the...
Read more
-
I strongly disagree with the new road scheme proceeding when organisations like UNESCO have clearly said it poses a threat to this unique World Heritage Site. Stonehenge has stood for millennia and it...
Read more
-
Since Stonehenge is designated as a World Heritage Site, it is my view that it should remain as such, and not be violated by the proposed plans for its development.
-
that this planning application is wholly unexeptable with in a world heritage site.
-
I object to the planned works on several grounds.
I believe that they will do irreparable damage to a World Heritage Site and that irreplaceable potential for achaeological examination and...
Read more
-
please do not build here. ever. please make sure this site is protected for eternity.
-
Stonehenge and its important World heritage Site should never be subject to engineering interventions that may destroy details.
This is an important World Heritage Site, described by UNESCO as a...
Read more
-
This representation concerns the suitability and safety of the rights of way for cyclists, horse riders and walkers, particularly the newly created rights of way and especially the restricted byway...
Read more
-
It seems obvious that a one lane road that passes a rare national heritage site should be extended to 2 lanes thereby not causing traffic congestion. This has happened throughout the country. ...
Read more
-
I am interested in the potential the scheme offers to provide reconnection and improvement to the rights of way around and over the scheme site for horse riders, carriage drivers and all other...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I whole heartedly object to the proposed road scheme at Stonehenge.
It is for perceived short term gain but at the permanent loss of ancient surroundings eg Blick Mead. The duelling, tunnels and...
Read more
-
This is an ancient site of huge cultural & archeological significance as well as biodiversity. As we are also aware that we are in a time of climate emergency where we must do everything we can to...
Read more
-
I dont know what to put here apart from I dont think the plannes roadway is totally wrong
-
This will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. It is unacceptable.
-
The current scheme threatens to destroy as yet undiscovered sites inside the Stonehenge UNESCO WHS area, as well as damaging already known but not fully investigated sites like Blick Mead. Moreover,...
Read more
-
I object to the plans to build a A303 tunnel. The tunnel will ruin this World Heritage Site and surrounding landscape. The water table will change and cause irreparaple damage to the Mesolithic site...
Read more
-
I disagree with the location of the tunnel entrance/exit on the plans
-
1. An imperfect “consultation” process
2014 Corridor Study County Hall, Taunton. I attended as representative of CPRE SW. I had experience of the Halcrow study of this corridor from my role on the...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned that the current tunnel construction plan will irrevocable damage to Stonehenge and surrounding precious WHS sites.
-
I object to this proposal first and foremost as the wonderful sight of Stonehenge as you drive Westwards will be denied to everyone. There is still not enough understood about this very important site...
Read more
-
I am convinced that the proposed road will inflict unconscionable harm to the Wold Heritage Site. In particular the tunnel approach and exit will carve huge swathes through potentially important...
Read more
-
i cannot object to this strongly enough. This will ruin an ancient and beautiful site
-
An ancient monument must not be damaged.
-
Irreparable damage to a World Heritage Site, when other, alternative routes could achieve the same thing.
-
In my opinion, this scheme has been ill-thought-through and there appear to be no other options on the table, which seems extraordinary in view of the site’s World Heritage status, its unique...
Read more
-
I can't understand why road traffic has priority over an incredibly historically ancient, environmentally and archaeologically sensitive area and why this scheme, irreversible in its impact and...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned that the present highway proposal will undermine the heritage significance of the wider Stonehenge landscape which is a fragile reality already partially compromised by existing...
Read more
-
I wish to express concerns related to the environmental impact of any proposed works, with specific regard to habitat destruction, and also concerns related to potential impact upon the preservation...
Read more
-
I feel this will cause irreparable damage to a well known World Heritage Site, it's archaeology and unparalleled landscape. I strongly agree with recent UNESCO advice that suggests the scheme should...
Read more