Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Expansion of Gatwick Airport will have a demonstrable effect on my quality of life.
-
I will not support for expansion of Gatwick airport route. This expansion is not good for nature Due to all kind of pollution which is going to affect on our day to day life .
-
I fully support this scheme as it will support the future growth and prosperity of the South East. It will also improve safety.
-
I oppose the application to create the emergency runway into a permanent one. The increase noise pollution will be noticeable and impact mental health. Myself and my family regularly visit areas such...
Read more
-
Passenger numbers will double, jobs and inhabitants will rise. This is not an incremental increase. We don't want the noise We don't want the vehicular expansion We don't want public services drained,...
Read more
-
I would like to oppose this suggestion for several reasons: - There is already a busy schedule at Gatwick Airport. While leaving not far from the airport we already face disturbance by the airplanes...
Read more
-
An additional runway will mean more flights which is not what we wish for when it is essential to control carbon dioxide addition to the atmosphere.
-
I object to the idea of having a second runway at Gatwick on the following grounds Extra noise in the air due to more flights More water needed. Already the south east suffers with a lack of water....
Read more
-
As a resident I already experience significant noise pollution from Gatwick Airport flight paths. The area I live in is part of the high weald, parts of which are designated AOB, it is reasonable to...
Read more
-
I fully support this project. Low impact infrastructure project which brings significant improvements to air transport and the local economy.
-
I dread to think how noisy my neighbourhood will become if Gatwick expands its capacity. My property is not even considered to be on the final approach and yet it is currently directly overflown at...
Read more
-
I wish to object to the run way as it will spoil my quality of life due to light and noise pollution created by the increased flight pattern. I propose the runway be placed on a north south aspect to...
Read more
-
1) Flights in and out of Gatwick already constitute significant noise nuisance in the surrounding area, often at night; further expansion will obviously make this worse. 2) A second runway will...
Read more
-
I oppose the application for a northern runway at Gatwick airport for the following reasons: *It is a new runway. The existing 2nd runway has been misrepresented by the applicant and does not comply...
Read more
-
We are writing as freeholder of the above property. The property is currently let to H1(London Gatwick) Ltd (our tenant) for a term of 99 years to 31/10/2085. The property is a Hotel operating under...
Read more
-
I wish to point out the negative and disruptive intrusion of planes directly over my house day and night despite living a 45 minute drive from Gatwick. In Summer, at times, I can’t listen to a radio...
Read more
-
Wholeheartedly support the project. Too many naysayers around who don't want to see changes yet complain not enough investments being made to support our public services. Its great for the local...
Read more
-
As a resident of Dormansland we are currently overflown directly by aircraft every few minutes during day time and frequently but less often at night. currently it is not possible to hold a...
Read more
-
I suspect the second runway is already being used as the air traffic flying over our property has become very disruptive and significantly impacts on ones enjoyment of our garden , particularly in the...
Read more
-
I oppose the plans on the basis that the expanded flight patterns associated with the proposal along with the increase in number of aircraft will cause significant damage in terms of noise to the area...
Read more
-
I object on the grounds that the proposed second runway is not using existing infrastructure. The proposed extension of the airport will create traffic problems making existing congestion much worse...
Read more
-
I whole heartedly OPPOSE the planned expansion of the runway- making the emergency runway into a permanent/ standard runway. We need LESS air pollution, less noise pollution. And this is already an...
Read more
-
I strongly oppose a further runway at Gatwick Airport. The Kent countryside is utterly beautiful, and one of the most lovely natural areas of the United Kingdom. We already have many airplanes...
Read more
-
I live under the flight pass from Biggin Hill the noise and pollution constantly affects our well-being . Therefore going to Hever Castle is a hidden gem without noise and pollution. Please help to...
Read more
-
what is the justification for gatwick expansion apart from profiteering. The area will not support this level of expansion. This is not to mention the additional noise and environmental...
Read more
-
I side with the concerns expressed currently and previously by Gatwick Obviously Not. The full environmental impact on residents under the flight paths has hitherto been underestimated and hence not...
Read more
-
I strongly object to the plan to convert the Gatwick emergency runway into routine use. The air traffic over the area around our part of the south east is constant and intrusive not only during the...
Read more
-
I strongly object to the second runway for Gatwick. My main concerns are the noise from airplanes which fly over my house which cause disturbance all throughout the day. An increase in frequency would...
Read more
-
I am strongly opposed to a second runway. It will contribute to climate change, air pollution and noise pollution. As a resident living in the Gatwick flight path, I already experience significant...
Read more
-
I am not convinced there is sufficient evidence of the need to provide for expansion, particularly in an acknowledged climate emergency. Noise, pollution, overuse of roads and lack of joined-up...
Read more
-
noise, traffic, overflying, pollution, congestion, climate
-
I oppose this development. It will create a huge amount of additional noise where I live. Currently we can't sleep with the windows open at night because of the sound of overhead planes. This is a...
Read more
-
If this 2nd runway goes ahead, it will cause more noise. More air pollution. It will damage the Ashdown forest. Think of the “carbon footprint”. It seems to me that drivers are always to blame for the...
Read more
-
Lingfield and Hever and the surrounding areas are all areas of beauty and currently already have a high amount of flight traffic - I oppose the new runway at Gatwick for this reason. It is detrimental...
Read more
-
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the new runway at Gatwick. The new runway will bring significantly more overhead traffic and noise to the village of Crockham Hill and will undoubtedly...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the impact of additional flights on my village and personally for my family’s quality of life. Also the environmental concerns of expanding airports and runways when we should be...
Read more
-
I wish to appose the project to expand the northern runway because this will contaminate the already very busy skies with more aircraft flying low over the AONB. There are enough aircraft flying over...
Read more
-
Am on the flight path and subject to planes currently every 3 minutes! Do not want this to increase as it’s unbearable especially during summer and at night! If this additional runway is approved will...
Read more
-
I regularly visit Hever and live in Sevenoaks. It’s such a beautiful and historic site which would be significantly impacted by constant flights going over. It’s a peaceful haven and a fascinating...
Read more
-
I'm hugely supportive of the plan to use the northern runway in the way Gatwick are proposing. More jobs for the area, and giving passengers more choice and not having to travel to Heathrow all the...
Read more
-
My parents live about 50 metres from the sound barrier [REDACTED] and have done for decades. It is the house I grew up in. [REDACTED] and if the proposed application is approved their quality of life...
Read more
-
Gatwick’s proposal would massively increase its capacity, causing excessive aircraft noise for a wide range of rural communities and destroying the peace and mental health benefits of a large areas of...
Read more
-
The application site is outside of the South Downs National Park, however the proposals will have some impact on the National Park, in particular in respect of tranquillity and dark night skies....
Read more
-
Hever Castle is a Grade 1 listed heritage attraction set within a Grade 1 listed park and garden which, in itself, is within the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (a designation that is...
Read more
-
We do not need all the additional pollution and noise that all the extra flights will produce especially when we are supposed to be doing all we can to reduce global warming
-
I oppose this on grounds of noise pollution primarily
-
I am completely against the proposal to add more flights to Gatwick. This is a terrible idea for the planet, for the noise emissions, extra air pollution and adding extra traffic getting into an often...
Read more
-
Why don't you consider the lives of ordinary people for a change?
-
The South and West perimeter of the M25 is already serviced by 2 very large Airports namely Heathrow and Gatwick. The traffic and infrastructure cannot support existing demands never mind creating...
Read more
-
I think this needs to happen to avoid the night flights, although it must be safe to do so
-
The Noise Preferential Route 4 passes very close to the Surrey Hills AONB which at a height of 750 feet is much closer to the aircraft than surrounding areas. The persistent noise and pollution from...
Read more
-
The roads around Gatwick airport are already extremely busy and expansion of the airport will only exacerbate this problem. Expansion will also make it necessary for more houses to be built in an area...
Read more
-
This relevant representation is being submitted by Tandridge District Council (TDC) in its role as a Host Authority for the Gatwick Northern Runway (NRP) Project Development Consent Order (DCO). Due...
Read more
-
I object to the expansion of Gatwick airport on environmental grounds . As a country we are supposed to be aiming for net zero carbon emissions. Adding an extra runway will put even more carbon in the...
Read more
-
Before any expansion of Gatwick Airport is even considered there needs to be several changes to the way aircraft are always flown down the same corridors when approaching to land. This has been a long...
Read more
-
My village lies in the Weald of Kent - an AONB & one which needs to be preserved for all future generations to enjoy. We already have our lives blighted by increasingly large aircraft flying low over...
Read more
-
Concerned about permanent rights to Church meadow. Concerned about increased traffic Concerned about increased air pollution and noise pollution from more aircraft.
-
Low flying flights to and from Gatwick are already causing significant noise in the area. On some days a steady stream of flights 30s apart can run from dawn till dusk. I do not support this expansion...
Read more
-
I support the project to use the North runway, it will support local jobs and the local economy.
-
Transport for the South East (TfSE) is a sub-national transport body (STB) that represents sixteen local transport authorities. These are Brighton and Hove, East Sussex, Hampshire, Kent, Medway,...
Read more
-
Thank you for your consultation regarding the above development. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) welcomes the opportunity to comment on your proposals at this stage of the project. Please note...
Read more
-
I don't think the second track is useful because: Traffic in the area is already congested, The highway is not lit, Because the airport charges prohibitive parking fees, many travellers park in the...
Read more
-
I and other members have been asked to support Hever Castle in opposing the second runway at Gatwick. I agree with the castle’s reasons for opposing as this is an area of outstanding beauty and a...
Read more
-
This proposal would affect my wellbeing due to already being on the Gatwick flight path.
-
There are already frequent noisy and low flying aircraft. To add another runway and allow more air traffic will only compound this already existing and stressful problem whilst also affecting the air...
Read more
-
Gatwick has not been a good neighbour as can be seen by the recent judicial review, it's very poor and cynical in collecting data to support its business. My objections are as follows: 1) Gatwick has...
Read more
-
There are fundamental flaws with this project and the premis of using the standby runway. Firstly, an increase in passenger numbers to the levels expected cannot be accommodated within the current...
Read more
-
I disagree with the proposed expansion of Gatwick airport on the grounds that it is unjustified by their often fallacious arguments, takes insufficient consideration of the environmental damage this...
Read more
-
GO for it!
-
I fully support the additional runway to Gatwick. It is key vital infrastructure that is needed as a viable alternative to Heathrow and other airports that support travel around London. This will...
Read more
-
Concerned about increased noise from aircraft, increased pollution and damage to road infrastructure from the increase in traffic
-
It is not sustainable to increase traffic around an already congested Gatwick. Air pollution will increase and damage people’s health. This would be against the government’s pledges to decrease global...
Read more
-
Even now, without the additional runway increasing capacity, the noise from planes flying through the night is causing altered sleep patterns which have a detrimental effect on health and well-being....
Read more
-
Expansion of Gatwick Airport will result in increased noise, air pollution, traffic congestion and diminished quality of life for local residents.
-
Any expansion of capacity at Gatwick should be subject to a ban on all arrivals (except if the result of delays) and take offs between 23.00 and 06.00 (similar to the quiet periods that apply at...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an application for a new runway and as such does...
Read more
-
Concerns over the environmental impact of more flights; increased road congestion, air and noise pollution
-
Air pollution - as you can appreciate we have a problem with air pollution from our planes flying overhead so hundreds more coming over our local towns and villages will add to more pollution. ULEZ...
Read more
-
Increased air traffic and noise over our village. Increased traffic on roads in the area. More pollution from both. More pressure on existing train routes passing through gatwick More to be provided…
-
Hi, regarding a planned extension of Gatwick. The tranquility and peaceful essence of the countryside I live in, is already degraded by flight paths overhead. Locally national treasure Hever castle...
Read more
-
Firstly the impact on the environment. We should be looking at ways to reduce pollution not proposing to increase the volume by another runway at Gatwick. Just a small example during the summer months...
Read more
-
Hi Please read my comments below, I am opposed to the new runway at Gatwick. I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – • Policy has been...
Read more
-
Greatly INCREASED NOISE which is inevitable if this Plan goes ahead. We live in an area under the current swathe of incoming traffic where arriving aeroplanes (unnecessarily) descend to between 4500...
Read more
-
This change will massively benefit people living near the airport and those that use it, as planes will be able to arrive & depart more efficiently.
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an application for a new runway and as such does...
Read more
-
I oppose the expansion and additional runway at Gatwick Airport. I oppose for Climate Change reasons I oppose for Global Warming reasons I oppose for additional noise, surface and air pollution...
Read more
-
There is too much noise pollution from the aircraft particularly in the summer when we are outside in the garden or trying to sleep at night with the windows open. I think there is already too much...
Read more
-
These are comments already posted however I reiterate them as a local resident: noise pollution, infrastructure burden and congestion around the airport as well as its impact on the environment and...
Read more
-
I run a design and marketing agency based in Tunbridge Wells we struggle to find staff. On some nights from 2 am till 4 am noisy old planes join the decent path over Tunbridge wells turning sharply...
Read more
-
There is still a material unused capacity on the existing runway - there is therefore no need for this 2nd runway - just make better use of the existing one before trying to take economical advantage...
Read more
-
I am a regular user of Gatwick and I fully support this project, we need to increase capacity for London to grow, get rid of the anti growth coalition
-
Flight movement increases, Flightpath impact on surrounding areas, both issues noise/pollution/ etc. Is there an impact/link to the future of the nearby Redhill Aerodrome? Passenger benefit v....
Read more
-
I disagree with the expansion plans. The airport was already refused permission for a second runway by the government, this is a second runway by stealth. Since the airport has changed there flight...
Read more
-
This application does not comply with the Airports National Policy Statement requiring airports (other than Heathrow) to demonstrate sufficient need to justify their expansion proposals, additional to...
Read more
-
Concern about noise and pollution. As early as 5 am it’s still noisy when I’m trying to sleep.
-
I would just like to say I think it would be a great addition to the area for jobs ect and as for noise and pollution things are getting better and better in that department just to many busy body's...
Read more
-
As an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty we are already blighted by the noise and pollutants generated by the flights in and out of Gatwick, which I understand is not subject to any restriction in the...
Read more
-
I believe there is an important need to strengthen UK infrastructure resilience. A second runway is important to achieve this, permitting more flexible use of the airport and protecting against...
Read more
-
I feel that building a second runway would impact on the surrounding environment. Gatwick have been using their emergency runway regularly causing aircraft to thunder over the top of my home with...
Read more
-
During the pandemic the Gatwick approach route has quietly changed to fly over an area of Natural Outstanding Beauty which has affected the sights of wildlife and birds (I live in West Hoathly). I do...
Read more