Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it


Filter

Mallard Pass Solar Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 901 to 1000 of 1222 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | View 50 results per page | 100

  • Mrs Patricia Ann Leaper

    * There will be continuous noise, pollution, disruption, and damage to property and surrounding area. * It will increase the impact of heavy HGV lorries and project associated workforce and vehicles... Read more

  • Mrs Vanessa Kimberley

    The profits of the proposed site will not , in my view, benefit the UK as the company who own Mallard Pass is not a UK one. The proposed site is larger than Westminster, imagine looking out the office... Read more

  • Pamela Russon

    This proposal is far too large . It would be using farmland/ green fields , that should be used for agricultural purposes . The effect on wildlife would be devastating. Solar panels should be on roofs... Read more

  • Philip Leaper

    * The vehicles entering and exiting the A6121, from the industrial areas, are already large, heavy, dangerous and unsuitable for the infrastructure of Essendine. *The further impact of weighty... Read more

  • Richard James Granville White

    My main concerns about the Mallard Solar Plant Proposal are: Increased Flood Risk for properties in the flood prone village of Greatford and the local area. Misuse of vast area of good quality... Read more

  • Sandra Jane Collins

    I live in what will be the centre of this proposed solar farm. The disruption to my everyday life will be immense. The roads in this area are rural lanes and are not able to cope with the volume of... Read more

  • William Adkin

    This vast project (2000+) acres will be a dominant feature of the surrounding area. it will be built, in part, on what is good agricultural land which in the long term interests of the country as a... Read more

  • A Mitchell

    In no order at this point: Sheer Scale Land use….AGRICULTURE not solar Visual impact combined with Mental Health transferring to physical health of the people affected by this. Ecology and Wildlife... Read more

  • Alexandra Ellis

    I am concerned about the use of agricultural land when there are numerous alternatives eg roof slopes of large industrial buildings. The prospect of compulsory acquisitions in Essendine is not... Read more

  • Benjamin Tony Evans

    I oppose the mallard pass solar farm because of the sheer size of the development in the chosen location. It will be a great loss of beautiful countryside, there are far more suitable areas for this... Read more

  • Darren Gray

    This will have a significant impact on the future use of high grade arable and grazing land, by removing it from use. Also, the resultant impact on wildlife is very much a concern. Other than during... Read more

  • David John Gladstone Wilby

    To big, too many disadvantages would ensue for a small rural community

  • Eric Tindall

    COVERING OUR AGRICULTURAL LAND WITH SOLAR PANELS IS A MISTAKE WHEN SO MANY INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS ACROSS THE UNITED KINGDOM HAVE VACANT ROOF SPACE THAT WOULD EASILY BE FITTED WITH SOLAR PANELS TO DO THE... Read more

  • Helena Swallow

    As a local resident I believe this land should remain as farming land. This project is planned with short term benefits in mind. We will need our agricultural land into the coming years - population... Read more

  • Joan Bavister

    Farmers allowing the use of good agricultural land have become turncoats and taken the Kings shilling. We are surrounded by notices keep out, get off my land, private. They despise the public, yet... Read more

  • Joanna Winterbourne

    This solar farm is going to decimate the countryside around stamford and impact all the villages to the north east of the time. The Secretary of State has just announced the need for access to the... Read more

  • Julie Beecham

    Extra traffic and restrictions on dog walking. Excess noise and disturbance to wildlife impacting on mental health.Compulsory aquirement of my land which I previously knew nothing about.

  • Madeline Davies

    We live in a beautiful productive area and can not understand why good quality farmland will be taken out of production when as a country we need more self sufficiency. To spend the rest of my life... Read more

  • Malcolm Osborne

    [redacted] are a Chinese Company, the panels would be assembled in China. DONOT support PRChina by awarding this contract. Great Britain should be utilising Business and Companies from friendly... Read more

  • Marian Busby

    This project will not only visually ruin a beautiful area of open land, it will remove the habitat of the local wildlife. I am also concerned that the already damaged local roads are not up to the... Read more

  • Martyn Mason Bradshaw

    too large on very good farm land.too near villages .the building will bad extra heavy traffic. bad to excise my horse not a inefficient as a source of energy.who will clear up at the end

  • Mary Ludlow

    . Loss of valuable farming land . Disruption to area by heavy traffic . The vista!

  • Miss Ann Hughes

    The problem with this project is that it is far too big for a rural village location and solar farms should not be placed on good farm land that is needed to feed our growing nation. The government... Read more

  • Muriel Ann Johnson

    Solar panels will be 3.3m high security fencing and CCTV, solar stations or shipping containers housing inverters/transformers dotted across the solar area. New sub-station will be visible & audible... Read more

  • Philippa Ball

    Far too big a site. Solar panels should be on roofs not arable land.

  • Rebecca Fitzpatrick

    My initial comments are that this would be a VAST solar farm in an area of natural beauty, farm land, listed buildings and beautiful villages, ancient woodland areas, wildlife and people who have... Read more

  • Gallery Stamford (Gallery Stamford) on behalf of Robert Walter Pheasant

    There is no plan in place for the removal of the panels at the end of their life. The use of a village to house the high voltage cabling having lost the right to run along the railway line, is... Read more

  • Sharon Mosley

    I am writing to express my massive concerns regarding this proposal to build this overwhelming solar farm in our tiny villages within Rutland. Rutland itself is the smallest county in England and has... Read more

  • Andrew Ebdon

    My over-riding concern about this project is the amount of 'Best and Most Versatile' agricultural land that will be given up to solar panels. While, nationally, we do need to have energy security, we... Read more

  • Errietta Panagiotopoulos

    In my opinion solar farms are not a good solution to our clean energy needs. There are 27 million households in the UK and many of these could have rooftop solar, not to mention the many often very... Read more

  • Margaret Elizabeth Anderson

    The proposed site is huge, far larger than any others in the UK and larger than Windel Energy and Canadian Solar have completed so far. The farm would be visible from miles around and will be a major... Read more

  • Peter Garry Smith

    I wish to object to the proposal because :- - it is inappropriate use of agricultural land - it is visually intrusive and hideously ugly - the scale is unsuitable and detrimental to the area in many... Read more

  • Rosemary Ann David

    Mallard Pass Solar Farm, is vast. A large percentage of it is to be built on high grade agricultural land and it will have a detrimental effect on all forms of wild life and the natural environment.... Read more

  • Rupert Gibson

    I object to this project. It is too large, it will destroy a huge area of countryside and farmland. Solar panels on buildings not fields.

  • Susan Bryars

    The size of the project is very worrying. Whilst I appreciate that the location is advantages in terms of access to the grid, to have split this into a number of smaller projects with similar... Read more

  • The residents of 46, High Street, Carlby (The residents of 46, High Street, Carlby)

    These are our main concerns: •The sheer scale of this project • The land is good farming land •The fact that villages and small communities will be surrounded by acres of solar panels •The impact on... Read more

  • William Michael Halford

    In my opinion solar farms are not a good solution to our clean energy needs. There are 27 million households in the UK and many of these could have rooftop solar, not to mention the many often very... Read more

  • Douglas Davidson Anderson

    The size of the site is far larger than any other proposed or operating in the UK. It will turn a rural landscape with good quality agricultural land into an industrial scar severely impacting on... Read more

  • Jill Salkeld

    The proposed solar farm is too close to housing and busy roads. It could be moved further away from these. There will be two years of noise, light pollution, disruption and damage for all those living... Read more

  • Kelham Cooke

    - 2 years of noise, light pollution, disruption and damage across 2,105 acre site and surrounding area. - Cabling to new sub-station may now run through Essendine on A6121 with Mallard Pass seeking... Read more

  • Kyla Mulvaney

    Concerns about environmental, agricultural and economic implications about this project. It is not in the best interests for Lincolnshire and the U.K. reduction of the size will only diminish the... Read more

  • Anne Wiltshire

    Though I am completely in favour of renewable energy including solar power I believe we should carefully consider the most appropriate places to put solar panels. The last place we should use is a... Read more

  • David Parry

    You should consider the impact on the local community and also the thousands of acres of good quality farm land that is just sitting there doing nothing

  • Gemma Popple

    As a resident with a young family, this project will completely ruin the village and surrounding area. I completely understand the need for alternative energy sources, but the size of this project... Read more

  • John Bavister

    This site will never become carbon neutral, as it is impossible to generate the amount of electricity claimed. To focus on the real finite generation of Carbon released by the use of PVs and the... Read more

  • Margot Walford

    I would prefer to see solar farms on brown field sites, not farm land.

  • Mary Parry

    Spoiling good agriculture land and wildlife.

  • Peter John Martindale

    I have lived in Castle Bytham for 47 years and am very familiar with the area currently being considered for the development of the Mallard Pass solar farm. I am in favour of the development as it has... Read more

  • Robert Beaver

    Solar panels should be on roofs of houses ,warehouses Factories & Brownfield sites not on food producing land And spoiling green countryside. Panels going on beautiful countryside and agriculture Land... Read more

  • Stella Morgan

    Apart from the devastation of the countryside, the loss of arable land, at a time when production needs to increase rather than the opposite, is something that must be avoided.

  • Barry Collins

    Travel through this area weekly it is beautiful as are the villages and houses that will be affected. It is prime agricultural land that is needed to prevent food shortages in the future. The size is... Read more

  • Ben Davies

    I want to oppose the solar farm in it’s current size and location

  • Doreen Anne Medcraft

    This project will have a significant impact on my life. .Its sheer scale implies unacceptable visual and noise levels which would magnify and disrupt during and after construction works. The impact on... Read more

  • Kate Chamberlain

    This project will cause a devastating loss to prime agricultural land and wildlife. The proposed solar farm is enormous and will destroy our beautiful countryside. I am not against renewable energy... Read more

  • Louise Barker

    Affect on wildlife, traffic, scale, destroy lovely countryside, no consideration for locals, reduce house values, omitting surveys such as deer, use of prime agricultural land not brown field sites,... Read more

  • MPSP-GDPR001

    Better than a housing estate

  • Mrs Anita Hassall

    Miss use of good farm land Damage to countryside, roads, wildlife, landscape. Massive increase of traffic. Excessive noise and pollution. Gridlocked roads Road safety risks

  • Muriel Collins

    Area far too large and enveloping villages. Wildlife will be affected, agriculture land will be lost, produced outside of Britain so no help to jobs or economy. Went to consultation staff had no idea... Read more

  • Peter John Barnett

    As much as we need clean energy, covering prime agricultural land is not the answer. 1. Where will the food come from that this land would produce? 2. Has the environmental impact of growing the food... Read more

  • Simeon Willson

    I do not agree with high quality arable land being used to build solar farms on. The damage to the ecology of this vast area will be devastating. The quality of life for those living in the area will... Read more

  • Victoria Jean Davidson Easton

    Solar panels should be on top of Factory units large farm barns etc and houses, not on fields!!

  • Carol Jones

    We need to save our farmland and not turn it into a plastic country side. We tell our youngsters there is too much plastic in our country yet Mallard Pass will not only put plastic in our fields but... Read more

  • Geraldine Toni Newmark

    It is too vast. It’s using valuable agricultural land. An awful lot of the equipment is sourced from China.

  • Idris Jones

    I moved to the country to enjoy the views and cycle and walk round the county. Mallard will not only stop me from doing what I enjoy i will have to look at it for the rest of my life. There are plenty... Read more

  • Lisa Kathryn Peverell

    I have a problem with the length of time the construction works will take. This will lead to disruption and noise to the village along with construction traffic with consequent access issues. The... Read more

  • Richard Wand

    Main issue is the loss of prime agricultural land forever and the effect that will to the local wildlife

  • Susan Tween

    I wish the application submitted by Mallard Pass Solar to be denied for the following reasons: • If this development were allowed to go ahead, it would set a precedent for other similar installations... Read more

  • Thomas Ede

    I have the following concerns over the proposed Mallard Pass installation: 1. The proposed "farm" is far too large (1052 acres) for the area and the height of the panel units (3.3 metres) is alarming.... Read more

  • Alan Godfrey Payne

    My main issues are the use of good agricultural land when there are alternative brown field sites available, flooding issues (our house has recently been flooded owing to existing drainage problems... Read more

  • Ivor Crowson

    I am most strongly opposed to the proposed development because it will take such a large amount of agricultural land out of production and the visual impact such a large development will have on this... Read more

  • Joan Payne

    It is not acceptable to use good agricultural land when there are brown sites available. We are short of food in the world and locally. It will ruin the countryside and be a blot on the landscape.

  • Roland Higgins

    I support the scheme because the UK needs solar farms as part of its electricity generation mix to enable it to reduce its reliance on fossil fuel. I like living/walking/cycling in this area but I... Read more

  • Alison Horton

    My concerns surrounding this proposal centre on the effect it will have on wildlife in the area, destroying habitats and access and the diversity of flora across the area. The extent of the planned... Read more

  • Ann Gillett

    The construction of Mallard Pass is considered to be a poor use of resource: Loss of valuable agricultural land: Agricultural land should be used to produce food, thus potentially reducing the need... Read more

  • John Stewart Gillett

    The construction of Mallard Pass is considered to be a poor use of resource: Loss of valuable agricultural land: Agricultural land should be used to produce food, thus potentially reducing the need... Read more

  • Judy Sewell

    This scheme will remove a huge chunk of agricultural land from food production. The UK needs to be more self sufficient in growing it’s own food and not importing it. This land is lovely to cycle... Read more

  • Karen Bourne

    This proposed solar farm would take more than 2,000 acres of mainly good quality arable land out of food production. It sits within a mile of some villages and of Stamford, blighting the rural... Read more

  • Kay Martin

    The Mallard Pass Solar station is a huge consumption of agricultural land which should focus on ensuring independent food production versus electricity which could be achieved through the use of... Read more

  • Leicestershire & Rutland Area Ramblers (Leicestershire & Rutland Area Ramblers)

    The Ramblers organisation, a national charity which includes the Leicestershire & Rutland Area, works to help everyone enjoy the pleasures and benefits of walking, and to enhance and protect the... Read more

  • Alexander Marsden

    Disrupted views to the countryside, should be put closer to large towns and industrial areas on waste ground. Proven on previous PV(solar) projects that they do not meet the advertised MW generation... Read more

  • Stamford, Bourne and The Deepings Ramblers Group (Stamford, Bourne and The Deepings Ramblers Group)

    We are ramblers I represent the Stamford, Bourne and The Deepings Ramblers Group and we use many of the public footpaths and rights of way in the locality. The joy of walking is taking in the... Read more

  • Elizabeth Sumption

    I am writing to strongly object to the plans to a erect the solar energy panels at the above site. I have attended the consultation in Stamford Townhall on Wednesday 29th of June. There are many, many... Read more

  • Katherine Ayton

    Disruption and compulsory access over residential property/land is not acceptable. Planned project is too big and essential works need to happen on roads and verges.

  • Kevin Ayton

    This concerns me due to scale, and the infrastructure compulsory access/purchase over residential and non involved farm land. The disruption to the local area will be massive over a two year period... Read more

  • Brian Cuppelditch

    Re proposed solar farm Mallard Pass. Size of the development in a rural area, and the visual impact on the surrounding area. Safety for the area with the proposed battery storage. Loss of agricultural... Read more

  • Helen Townsend

    The Solar farm is too large a project to be around the village. It will take away agricultural land. What happens long term if the energy company goes bust. There will be so many batteries on the... Read more

  • Jane Cuppelditch

    My comments refer to the proposed Solar farm site "Mallard Pass" at Essendine. The size of the development for the smallest county inEngland, Rutland. concerns me. Loss of habitat for flora and fauna.... Read more

  • Mrs Barbara Smitheringale

    The scale is far too large, I am concerned about the loss of agricultural land and the visual impact.

  • Philip Muttett

    I do not believe the benefits of Mallard Pass Solar Farm will outweigh the significant costs and impact on the villages that will be affected by it.

  • Mrs Isobel Margaret Barnett

    1. Prime agricultural land being taken out of food protection. 2. Where will the food come from that would have been grown on this area? 3. What is the true environmental impact and carbon footprint... Read more

  • Annette Patricia Haynes

    1. Rutland is the smallest county in England and already has the 2nd largest man made reservoir in England which did take hundreds of acres of farming land and villages . Forty two years on, the... Read more

  • David George Woodman

    A very expensive, heavily subsidized blot on the landscape and useless at providing cheap reliable energy supplies when it is most needed in the winter nights.

  • Gordon Stanley Haynes

    This project 1) will destroy the visual amenities we currently enjoy,2) drastically reduce the value of all properties that overlook and are adjacent to the site,3) discourage visitors and investment... Read more

  • Karen Neale

    I am writing to raise objection to the proposed Mallard Pass Solar Farm (MPSF) application. The scale of the proposal is vast, covering an area between 2 and 3 times the size of Stamford as it exists... Read more

  • Mr Gerald Brean

    We are losing our surrounding country side to housing the proposed solar installation will be very large blot on the landscape, about the environment which Boris was advising us we were going green... Read more

  • Peter Heyes

    There are many alternatives to this: Loss of quality agricultural land; Damage to the environment and natural fauna and flora; Impact on local housing. The threat of compulsory purchase of privately... Read more

  • Chloe L Harley

    I live locally to the proposed development (Great Casterton) and could be affected by traffic related to the development. I am for renewable energy but against using agricultural land for it when... Read more

  • Ian Trevor Jacques

    I cycle all over Leicestershire and Rutland On my bike i sit higher up than the average car.. Solar panels are largely obscured by the height of the hedges. Only at this time of the year when the... Read more

  • Janina Harding

    LOCAL ECOLOGY AND WILDLIFE - This project is colossal in size. Among the vast pages sent to us it does not specify pylons and traffic impact. LANDSCAPE/ VISUAL IMPACT - The sheer size of this project... Read more

  • Jean Norma Moulds

    I think it ludicrous that these solar panel farms are going onto good arable land when we have thousands of acres of rooftops that could be used. All new housing should be fitted and help should be... Read more