Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I'm interested in keeping the rights of way open to allow access to all forms of transport.
I'm concerned that these will be shut or full access not given.
-
User of public rights of way specifically Byways Open to all Traffic (BOAT)
-
I am deeply concerned about the proposed A303 Expressway mainly on the grounds of:
A. Damage to the site: Stonehenge is not just to do with the stones themselves but the landscape in which in they...
Read more
-
I believe that all byways should be kept open for all to enjoy. Not only are they a superb way of seeing the countryside in local area but also provide hours of enjoyment for the people who use them
-
I intend to make points regarding the need for byways to remain open to all users including motor vehicle's, both for leisure and acess purposes.
To make points regarding acess to the land around...
Read more
-
I am opposed to plans to 'improve' the A303 which seem to be in reckless disregard for preservation of the world heritage site. It concerns me that advice from UNESCO is not being listened to. I am...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed scheme as it will irreparably damage a site of national and global importance. The site should be preserved for the benefit of future generations and not affected by the short...
Read more
-
I enjoy the byways and interested in keeping them open for all to enjoy
-
I wish state interest in public rights of way that need protecting. Small section of A303 will need to become BOAT to prevent existing byways becoming dead ends.
-
i wish to help try and protect the public rights of ways surrounding stonehenge.
-
I would like to protest to this action and protect the historic rights of way in this country.
Both rights of wat and Stone Henge have co-existed for many centuries without the need for legislation....
Read more
-
Public rights of way need to be protected and remain open to all users.
-
I am regestering my opposition to closure or modification of public rights of way around the Stonehenge area. Public rights of way should be preserved.
-
I am concerned about the impact on, and likely irreparable damage to, the WHS of Stonehenge, and I note that UNESCO recommends that the scheme should not proceed in its present form.
I am also...
Read more
-
THERE IS A CHEAPER, BETTER AND LESS RISKY SOLUTION
There is ABSOLUTELY NO NEED for the road to take the proposed route. Instead there are other much cheaper, better and easier ways to solve the issue...
Read more
-
Construction of a new roadway, that causes irreparable damage, a view which is supported by [Redacted], is highly irresponsible.
Other options have not been pursued with serious intent, they have...
Read more
-
Preservation: This site of Antiquity and history must be maintained in the state of it's original purpose when constructed.
Global Outcry: The eyes of the world will be unfavorably placed upon the...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
The proposed scheme would cause irreparable damage to this world famous archaeological site. The proposed scheme has been roundly condemned by local, national and international authorities including...
Read more
-
The plans for the tunnel do not adequately protect this wonderful UNESCO site.
The tunnel will bring faster, noisier traffic, there will be no ability to view the stones from the road, and this...
Read more
-
This road scheme will cause huge damage to as yet unexplored archaeological sites.
It will be a noisy and visual intrusion on a precious open landscape.
It will encourage more motor traffic which...
Read more
-
As a previous native citizen of Salisbury who has visited Stonehenge, I am deeply concerned that any major engineering work (including, but not limited to, excavation) in the vicinity of the monument...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a unique world heritage site and extremely special, it should not be devalued or encroached on by a road
James Knight
-
I believe that the plans (subject to necessary and appropriate consultation with interested parties must be pursued. The traffic delays caused by the status quo are severely damaging to the South...
Read more
-
The proposed infrastructure would cause irreparable damage to the world heritage site, which is one of the most important landmarks in the UK
-
Dear Sirs,
I am writing to you as a very concerned UK citizen, at the moment living and working in Chicago, USA .
I am writing with regards to the planning proposal for the A303 Stonehenge...
Read more
-
These plans will cause irreparable damage to the UNESCO World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. UNESCO has described the area as a ‘landscape without parallel’ and their international...
Read more
-
I have been following the Blick Mead Mesolithic site since it's discovery and feel that it is of massive interest and importance - there is much more to learn there.
I feel the loss of the view of...
Read more
-
I object to the proposal
• It will cause Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
•UNESCO’s international advisers say the...
Read more
-
It is my belief that the tunnel as currently proposed will cause irreparable damage to the archaeology of this precious prehistoric landscape which no amount of mitigation will suffice. The proposals...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a word heritage site and is of national and international importance. Archeological discoveries are being made and are just scratching the surface of our understanding of this emense...
Read more
-
Although the scheme is in principle good, the is a single major issue which remains very alarming: the location of the western tunnel portal and approach cutting. Archaeological sensitivity requires...
Read more
-
This is a World Heritage site and must be protected under strict rules and this work would mean this would not be protected. Approval from the world heritage organisation must be sort.
We protect...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the high risk of geological stresses this project puts on an area of such unparalleled cultural, historical and emotional importance, not only to the natives of Britain but to...
Read more
-
Rwy'n gwrthwynebu'r niwed a gynigir i Gôr y Cewr. Mae'n safle sanctaidd ac ni ddylid ei niweidio o dan eich gofal. Mae'r wefan hon wedi cael ei barchu am filoedd o flynyddoedd ac ni ddylech dderbyn...
Read more
-
lIrreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I object to the irreparable damage that the A303 proposed tunnel will do to Stonehenge WHS
-
Stonehenge alone is not the whole matter. The landscape itself is a historic monument which should not be interfered with for the convenience of those driving through. One point of the Henge itself is...
Read more
-
I object to your plans to dig a tunnel through this historic site
-
I am concerned about the destruction of valuable achaeological sites that the new road would destroy. I also believe that some wild life will lose their habitat.Also Stone Henge as a sacred site will...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ and I feel that not enough is being done to preserve it.
UNESCO’s...
Read more
-
In summary my representation is that as a member of the public I wish to be able to contribute my views on this matter. I do take my family by car to visit Stonehenge and I use the road that has been...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed A303 Stonehenge Expressway for the following reasons:-
1. It would do irreparable damage to the Stonehenge World Heritage Site (WHS), its archaeology and its setting. UNESCO...
Read more
-
The unique site of Blick Mead represents the oldest site of the Stonehenge archaeological landscape, dating back to the Mesolithic period c.10,000 - 8,000 BC. As such, it places the monument and...
Read more
-
I am worried about damage to the site. I believe that profit will take precedence over the protection of the Stones.
-
I am very concerned about the impact that the A303 Stonehenge Expressway will have on this most sensitive World Heritage Site
-
This plan is terrible. It endangers a World Heritage site, will disturb and destroy important archaeology, cause increased noise in the area of the WHS and harm wildlife.
We should not be building...
Read more
-
As a citizen of the United States of America and as a global citizen, I would like to express my concern regarding continuance and completion of this upcoming project. While I understand and...
Read more
-
I object to the construction of the A303 Stonehenge Expressway because of the damage it would do to the World Heritage Site, and to the Blick Mead Mesolithic site.
-
So often we are left mourning that a species has become extinct, that we have ruined some environmental aspect of our planet, damaged a historical building beyond repair.
In between is prehistory;...
Read more
-
The building of the tunnel will irreparably damage the heritage site.
-
I would like to register my dismay at the building of a road through the Stonehenge landscape of of exceptional prehistoric interest. This astonishing landscape is one of the most significant...
Read more
-
Due to monetary constraints existing at the moment what is the logic of sinking a tunnel when for a fraction of the cost a dual carriage way could be built. If previous governments had progressed with...
Read more
-
1) Why on earth would any right minded persons or organisations ever dream of causing untold damage to such a wonderful site.
2) There must be other answers to resolving the traffic problems that...
Read more
-
The extreme roadworks to this heritage site can and will cause extreme disruption to the archeological value of the area. It will disrupt what is there. In addition no one will be able to see the...
Read more
-
The proposed scheme will cause irreparable damage to the archaeology and setting of the World Heritage Site around Stonehenge. It will cut across and destroy parts of the wider prehistoric landscape,...
Read more
-
I am writing as someone who grew up at Boscombe Down and knows the area well. My major concern is the damage to the archeology of the landscape both known and that not yet discovered. In particular I...
Read more
-
Damage to wildlife and countryside
Loss of view from the passing road
Huge expense
-
The proposed scheme will cause irreversible damage to a wider prehistoric landscape that is only just beginning to be understood; it will damage the internationally important Blick Mead site and...
Read more
-
As a Dane with English reletives, I have visited the site of Stonehenge with ny children and now grandchildren year after year. The place is irreplaceable and should not be damaged in any way.
-
Increased vehicle noise from faster traffic.
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting.
Lack of alternative...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage Site and should be treated with the utmost respect. There is much still to be discovered in the wider prehistoric landscape and any new road building or tunneling should...
Read more
-
In September 1918 Lord Chubb, on giving the Stonehenge landscape to the nation, wrote “All controversy will now cease and Stonehenge so dear to our hearts will now rest safe and secure...”
There...
Read more
-
I am not satisfied that the potential for damage to this unique and irreplaceable site is being considered properly, there is clearly real cause for concern.
-
What is being done to Stonehenge is sacrilege.
Please stop now.
-
I am particularly anxious that none of the important archaeological remains all around the Stonehenge area is disturbed.
Would seriously suggest less advertising for people to see Stonehenge. It is...
Read more
-
I object to this piece of wanton vandalism. In 2016 i did a number of walks in the Stonehenge area. These made it clear that Stonehenge exists in an incredible landscape of historic features. It is...
Read more
-
It is important that j'ust because we can do something, doesn't mean we should', is weighed up in this case. It would seem that alternative options with less negative impact have not been provided or...
Read more
-
- There will be extensive damage to this world heritage site. Stonehenge is integrated into a complete landscape, it is part of a much larger environment and is not a 'stand alone' monument. The...
Read more
-
I object to this plan purely because of the damage it will do to such an important site, to both archaeological remains, flora and fauna and to a a World Heritage site. There is no doubt that...
Read more
-
Everyone should be able to see the stones for free, and that includes driving past.
Disturbance to the wildlife inc rare bird species
-
Although I am not a local, the site is obviously of national and global significance.
The possibility of damage (which, in fact, has already occurred) to the surrounding site, which is of equal...
Read more
-
This site is described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape and they say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form because of incredible damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting.
More...
Read more
-
I am concerned about damage to an ancient national monument and it's surrounding area, including artifacts not already discovered. In addition, the view of the stones will be lost from the road,...
Read more
-
If we drive a tunnel though this precious historical landscape we can never reconstitute the archaeological evidence that will have been destroyed. For a [Redacted] road?! We’ve got plenty of those...
Read more
-
I believe this public works project will make irreparable damage to the WHS, the unique archaeology of the landscape and the setting of a historically significant location.
Changes like these can...
Read more
-
I am profoundly concerned about the environmental and archaeological impact of the proposed scheme.
In particular, I am extremely anxious about the Blick Mead site, discovered only so recently in...
Read more
-
Concern about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting
-
I don't want Stonehenge to collapse
-
I have huge concerns that alternatives that wouldn't cause irreversible damage to a World Heritage Site were not provided in the consultation. It worries me greatly how many highly destructive...
Read more
-
As an avid historian, I am very disappointed and shocked to learn about this proposed development. Our heritage belongs to the people, both present and future, and the road risks impediments to access...
Read more
-
please don't damage our stones or any remains near them and please respect the environment and other people's views. thank you.
-
Stonehenge and it’s surrounding areas are more valuable to this Country and the World at large that it should be protected at all cost. UNESCO has said it is unparalleled. We have a duty to protect...
Read more
-
Please don't destroy the world heritage site at Stonehenge for the sake of a bit of traffic control.
-
The tunnel will cause irreparable damage to a World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme...
Read more
-
This would bring about irreversible damage to this World Heritage site, its archaeology and setting. We have a duty to preserve these sites for generations to come. UNESCO’s international advisers are...
Read more
-
I have been following this application with horror. I understand the need to.improve traffic flow in the Stonehenge area but the current plans are simply wrong. Some years sgo I studied prehistory,...
Read more
-
The World Heritage Sites advisory body has concerns over the plans as it could cause irreversible damage to the site. This is a truly unique part of our heritage and as such we should do everything in...
Read more
-
This works are unacceptable in such a special site for what more roads so we can go faster faster killing as we go how can you even contemplate this in an important world heritage site
-
Irreparable damage to our most important and spectacular archaeological landscape.
UNESCO are opposed to the scheme in its current form.
Potential damage to the recently discovered Blick Mead...
Read more
-
I have concerns that the stonehenge tunnel will damage the structure of the WHC and damage the surrounding environment.
-
I believe that the proposed development is undesirable because it will undermine some very important historical sites, and will not be good for the environment.
Stonehenge has already suffered far...
Read more
-
I believe the current plans for the A303 in the region around Stonehenge do not take into account all the areas of the World Heritage Site, and the potential damage to them - especially in view of the...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage Site. The area around Stonehenge must remain complete, as it currently is, in order to preserve this site for future generations. Whilst I sympathise with the traffic...
Read more
-
I am registering to express my opposition to the tunnel being built beneath Stonehenge.
I believe the tunnel will have a damaging effect upon the grounds and energy of Stonehenge something we have...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to our most important and spectacular archaeological landscape.
UNESCO are opposed to the scheme in its current form.
Potential damage to the recently discovered Blick Mead...
Read more
-
As a citizen of the world, I believe Stonehenge as a UNESCO World Heritage Site belongs to us all, and I'm very concerned that this infrastructure project, as currently planned by Highways England,...
Read more
-
This is a terrible thing to do to an important archaeological landscape.
-
The plans will undoubtedly cause damage to the world heritage site. The Blicksmead disaster is proof of this.As well as spoiling the iconic view of Stonehenge that is our children’s inheritance it...
Read more