Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
The plans would effectively give Gatwick a new second runway, but Government policy is that any new runway in the South East should be at Heathrow. (Though we think that there shouldn't be any new...
Read more
-
An ever increasing capacity at airports and the additional vehicle movements associated with that expansion is contrary to the need to reduce UK global warming emissions.
-
Noise Expansion of Gatwick would significantly increase aircraft noise for those further away under flight paths. The Environment Gatwick Airport is situated within an area valued for its unparalleled...
Read more
-
There is absolutely no need for an additional runway at Gatwick. I am a frequent air traveller and, if anything, observe that the volume of travellers at Gatwick and other airports has significantly...
Read more
-
Living close to the airport, I am concerned about the increase in air pollution and the impact of this on our health and that of our future family. The impact of having substantially more planes in...
Read more
-
My concerns lie with the additional noise as well as the detrimental effect of carbon emissions where the UK is already dismally failing. In addition there will be an impact to road congestion and...
Read more
-
Global Airlines is a new, British based carrier, with ambitions to enhance the passenger experience and provide additional, much needed, connectivity and capacity from the South-East of England to the...
Read more
-
there are many reasons to oppose a new runway at Gatwick, but the most important of all is the fact that we are living in a climate emergency - declared by our own government in 2019 (despite the...
Read more
-
I am concerned by the expansion being proposed. I understand the time to comment has been extended. Dear Sirs, I, Gordon Lee-Steere of (Redacted) oppose the Gatwick Airport application for a northern...
Read more
-
I am totally opposed to having a second runway at Gatwick Airport. This is for several reasons. The world needs less flying and it is becoming increasingly unnecessary. We face a huge crisis and need...
Read more
-
Dear Sir/Madam Gatwick Airport Northern Runway Statutory Consultation Response from Greensand Holdings Limited 1. Please note that Greensand Holdings Limited, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Reigate...
Read more
-
Oppose the Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – it is NOT using existing infrastructure and should not be accepted as such. 1. Policy has been misinterpreted...
Read more
-
Increased harm to the natural environment in the Surrey Hills area caused by additional noise, pollution, associated traffic to and from the airport and the planes themselves. The effect on climate...
Read more
-
I'm so concerned about this, how we can an extra 100,000 flights a year be a good idea? This will have such a significant impact on our environment, climate, and all the communities in the surrounding...
Read more
-
This relevant representation has been submitted separately for both LHR Airports Limited and Heathrow Airport Limited, which are related companies within the Heathrow group corporate structure. For...
Read more
-
The local infrastructures are unable to cope with present day needs, schools, GP surgeries, roads, parking, trains. Increased noise and pollution from aircraft and local service traffic and...
Read more
-
In the view of Historic England, under this scheme proposal there is the potential for harm to a range of heritage assets, including: • to a number of undesignated archaeological heritage assets in...
Read more
-
I make the following comments in respect of any planned expansion of the airport at Gatwick Environmental Impact The proposed expansion would significantly increase Gatwick’s CO2 emissions and other...
Read more
-
Increasing accessibility to the airport, free drop off and parking (redacted) for the increased air travel. While managing the traffic flows in and around Gatwick and the town of Horley. Ensuring long...
Read more
-
Concern about negative impact on environment and existing infrastructure. Anxious that it represents another South East investment contrary to levelling up agenda.
-
We do not need airport expansion due to health and environmental reasons. We already have too many aircraft along with noise. We can smell aircraft fuel on a daily basis which is terrible. Think bc...
Read more
-
Gatwick Airport is already used to capacity. Local areas are blighted by the noise pollution ( and probable air pollution) of continuous flights taking off and landing at the airport.The impact of...
Read more
-
I am concerned the impact this will have on the area we live in and have objected to the application and the significant damage and impact it will have on our village and local area. There are great...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the increase in proposed aircraft movements if the Gatwick expansion is allowed to go ahead will cause greater aircraft noise and pollution over my property, which is already...
Read more
-
Air pollution from the extra flights. The flight path would then make to much noise in my area could effect my sleep as I do shift work. The expansion would also effect people living in the areas...
Read more
-
Climate change - impact on UK's greenhouse gas emissions from airport expansion before low emissions aircraft (of the passenger capacity envisaged by these plans) have been developed. Please see the...
Read more
-
Live in Woldingham and concerned about increased number of flights flying over the village which is an AONB on the North Downs
-
The expansion will mean LGW becomes the size of LHW - over 100,000 additional flights and 34 million passengers per annum. The existing infrastructure is poor and the proposed infrastructure is...
Read more
-
If we have any chance of reaching our climate goals, and halting the increase in global temperatures the last thing we should be doing is encouraging more air travel. Arguing that it will provide jobs...
Read more
-
I am principally concerned at the noise impact of the proposal as we are on the landing flight path, and already blighted by overflying aircraft on their way into Gatwick. This is already an...
Read more
-
I am registering because I am extremely concerned about the climate impact of all airport expansions. This is a national, cumulative issue and not just one that affects local people.
-
I am objecting because I am concerned about an increase in road traffic with no improvements to local infrastructure to allow for increased traffic. Also concerned about the impact on the environment...
Read more
-
Added pollution in an already very busy area. More traffic and delays meaning added pollution from standing traffic. More staff needed and where will they live?
-
We live directly under the flight path and as I type this I can hear a plane flying far too low on its descent into Gatwick. It is bad enough now - planes not observing the correct heights on their...
Read more
-
We already suffer intrusive noise polution every day for 5 or more hours, not to mention the chemical polution, which is not monitored. Any increase in traffic can only make things worse.
-
Even at the moment we get planes flying directly over our house-I mean DIRECTLY. Often well below the permitted height !!!
-
In view of the shortage of housing and excessive amount of water being taken from local rivers I do not think we need this sort of development in Sussex. In order to encourage airlines to use regional...
Read more
-
Gatwick is very close to an area of outstanding beauty, the North Downs, Box Hill, Leith hill etc, and a number of villages. Increased plane traffic will not only create significant noise pollution,...
Read more
-
I am (redacted) years old. I live right in the middle of the village, under the flight path. Night after night, I am woken at different hours. I realise that the fact of being woken up so frequently...
Read more
-
The unacceptable impacts on my life and environment are; Loss of green space and increase in hard landscaping will result in more floodwater and pollution in the River Mole, flooding our vulnerable...
Read more
-
Noise Expansion of Gatwick would significantly increase aircraft noise both for those living near the airport and for those further away under flight paths. The noise envelope Gatwick has proposed are...
Read more
-
For our day visitors, enjoying time away from the noise and stresses of everyday life; for our residential guests hoping for a good night sleep; for our wedding couples saying ‘I do’; for the children...
Read more
-
This will create further noise disturbance which seems to have increased significantly lately even without another runway.. Even more road congestion through Horley which struggles already even at out...
Read more
-
I object to this development for many reasons. I live under the flight path, the noise pollution is horrid. I struggle to hear the birdsong, you want to make it worse. And plane lights shining into...
Read more
-
concerned about increase in aircraft noise very concerned on impact on climate change concerned about the devaluation of my home concerned of the affect on my wellbeing through increase in aircraft...
Read more
-
I write to you on behalf of Leigh Parish Council. The Councillors have considered the proposal and its impact on it as a community. The following areas are of great concern and asks that they be taken...
Read more
-
This relevant representation has been submitted separately for both LHR Airports Limited and Heathrow Airport Limited, which are related companies within the Heathrow group corporate structure. For...
Read more
-
Limpsfield Parish Council is a democratically elected organisation, representing the residents of the Limpsfield Parish in the District of Tandridge. We have reviewed the expansion plans, studies and...
Read more
-
I am astounded that this project is even being considered. It will cause so much pollution, especially noise. It's terrible for the environment. The local roads are full and we don't have...
Read more
-
The DCO application should not be accepted as making best use of existing infrastructure, as Gatwick do not and cannot deliver a 2 runway airport using the current emergency runway. It is misleading...
Read more
-
I oppose Gatwick airport expansion with no extra funding for infrastructure and no compensation for noise for environmental reasons. A 2nd runway would add more noise pollution, over 1 million tonnes...
Read more
-
Richmond Council opposes airport expansion in light of the climate emergency, and wishes to register as an Interested Party in case we wish to make further representations.
-
The expansion to the runway will severely affect the lives of residents in this area. We already have to cope with numerous aircraft and related noise and a greater number of planes will cause...
Read more
-
I object to any development / expansion of UK airports in light of the Climate Crisis. I would therefore like to express an interest in this proposal
-
There are planes flying over Tunbridge Wells that wake me every night at times that they are not supposed to be flying overhead. It happens EVERY night. Planes fly over the town all day long when they...
Read more
-
I live on the A25, the current new diversion route for the M25. We already have many sleepless nights with the diverted motorway traffic passing through our small village. If the airport expands, this...
Read more
-
I’m writing to express my objections to the expansion plans of London Gatwick. London Gatwick Airport is a single runway airport with an emergency runway (now called the Northern Runway by the owners...
Read more
-
I live in Horsham and I fear that a second runway at Gatwick will reduce my quality of life, in many ways. 1) Increase in aircraft noise – with up to an additional 101,000 flights a year, running from...
Read more
-
I do not want flights re routed over Hever Castle
-
I am opposed to airport expansion. We are in a climate crisis which is only going to accelerate if we don’t stop this reckless use of fossil fuel. Planes are the most polluting form of transport and...
Read more
-
I absolutely object to this project because of the airline industry's substantial addition to the causes of Climate Change. Climate change is the most serious and far reaching emergency on this planet...
Read more
-
I am against the development on a number of grounds: 1. Detrimental impact on AONB and historic protected assets, including Hever Castle, which is a Grade 1 listed heritage attraction set within a...
Read more
-
1. Noise pollution - flights have already increased over our home and in addition they are flying lower than they used to. The noise has increased late at night affecting sleep. This will only worsen...
Read more
-
Main issues that I want to address are: - local area infrastructure (roads, trains services) being put in place given the increase in flights - noise pollution impact and how this will be mitigated -...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – · Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
Our roads (motorways and local) are not suitable for the amount of traffic that the additional runway and terminal would bring to the area.
-
In order to comply with legally binding carbon-reduction targets for transport, the proposal would necessitate a full network of out-of-road walking and cycling infrastructure, both for the airport...
Read more
-
How this will effect my child, work and I.
-
The proposal would engender increased reliance on flying and thus reduce the possibility of reducing UK CO2 emissions to meet net zero targets. The associated personnel and housing demand would...
Read more
-
The DCO application should not be accepted as making best use of existing infrastructure, as Gatwick do not and cannot deliver a 2 runway airport using the current emergency runway. It is misleading...
Read more
-
I have lived in the Lingfield area since 1989. Since then, except for the downturn in the national economy in 2008 and then for the duration of the Covid lockdown, there has been a steady increase in...
Read more
-
I have concerns about the impact to the surrounding area when the works to the road network is undertaken abd would like to know more about this. I would like to know what measures are bring put in...
Read more
-
We are already greatly affected by the noise from aircraft on Route 4 flying over this area, even though we are not in the NPR. Gatwick and the regulator do nothing about this, in fact it is getting...
Read more
-
The DCO application should not be accepted as making best use of existing infrastructure, as Gatwick do not and cannot deliver a 2 runway airport using the current emergency runway. It is misleading...
Read more
-
I am against the development as Hever Castle is a Grade1 listed heritage attraction set within a Grade 1 listed park and garden which, in itself, is within the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural...
Read more
-
I live on a country road which has a 40MPH speed limit. It is already very busy with airport traffic and the village has a single lane bridge, narrow winding road and a junior school. Also the...
Read more
-
This is not inline with Government policy on net zero carbon emissions Noise levels from aircraft are already oppressive where we live and this would make things worse.
-
The DCO application should not be accepted as making best use of existing infrastructure, as Gatwick do not and cannot deliver a 2 runway airport using the current emergency runway. It is misleading...
Read more
-
I object to the Gatwick expansion on account of the impact on traffic and environment including impact of additional flights on climate change
-
I oppose this development because the Climate Change Committee has stated there should be no further expansion of UK airports until technology is proven, which it isn't!. I oppose this application...
Read more
-
Increased traffic on already congested roads. Deterioration of our roads - and costs for maintenance will fall to residents via council tax. Increased noise from additional flights. Increased...
Read more
-
I am objecting to the intensification of Gatwick Airport which will bring about greater emissions and noise pollution.
-
The decision makers need to listen to their own scientific advisors; the CCC who have clearly stated that there should be no airport expansions. There should also be a cumulative impact assessment of...
Read more
-
Ockley Parish Council wishes to raise concerns over the proposed massive expansion of Gatwick Airport on the ground of the impact on residents of the surrounding areas, including noise pollution,...
Read more
-
I would like to register my objection to the second runway at Gatwick Airport being constructed. There are far too many flights taking place at the moment, all day & night and as we live directly on...
Read more
-
One of my concerns is the A23 which is very crowded now. It is the main route for ambulances to use for the East Surrey hospital. I know they occasionally use the back roads, but unless they have had...
Read more
-
I object to the 2nd runway at Gatwick Airport because of all the noise we have from planes over our house not to mention the pollution & a lot more traffic on our dangerous country lanes. We don’t...
Read more
-
Quality of life, excess noise and pollution caused by the expansion of Gatwick with further flights passing over our house.
-
Noise - Expansion of Gatwick would significantly increase aircraft noise both for those living near the airport and for those further away under flight paths. The effect of many more aircraft overhead...
Read more
-
Airport expansion only considers the operation of the airport and flight take-off paths to 3000 feet (I understand) and landing glide paths under control of the airport. Is the increase in the...
Read more
-
We are opposed to the proposed development of Gatwick Airport for the following reasons: Excessive Increase in air pollution, noise, and traffic in the locality. Massive pressure on an already...
Read more
-
Noise pollution Increased number of aircraft Impact on environment Sleepless nights Impact on climate
-
Good morning. Thank you for this facility to comment on the Gatwick North Runway. Our home is located 0.3 miles / 0.5 kilometres to the north east of Gatwick Airport. Although we experience aviation...
Read more
-
The environment both in relation to airports, air transport and the pollution by mass tourism in the resorts, cities, and previously unspoilt areas. Why can't we exercise restraint, common sense and...
Read more
-
To whom it may concern I strongly oppose Gatwick Airport's proposed Northern Runway expansion and any further growth at Gatwick. I live in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. I have uninterrupted...
Read more
-
Relevant Representation on behalf of Railway Pension Nominees Limited Railway Pension Nominees Limited (“Railpen”) is the freehold owner of the hotel operating as Radisson RED London Gatwick Airport,...
Read more
-
Gatwick Airport's plans to bring its so-called northern runway, the taxiway which runs parallel to its main "southern" runway and currently doubles up as a standby or emergency runway when the main...
Read more
-
‘see Relevant Representation attached to email dated 26th October 2023 from LDF@reigate-banstead.gov.uk
-
These comments are from the Local Authority's perspective as a land owner. We have concerns about proposals that impact our land ownership at Riverside Gardens Park and Church Meadows and as regards...
Read more
-
I strongly object to a second runway at Gatwick airport. There is too much air traffic over the south-east already affecting air and noise pollution. Also, for local communities this proposal would be...
Read more