Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Gatwick Airport Northern Runway

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 2401 to 2500 of 4813 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | View 50 results per page | 100

  • Mrs Jane D Wagstaff

    Noise level of even more flights directly over our house, impacting our sleep and the fact that even though we are at quite a distance from Gatwick, we have to stop our conversation in the garden as... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Nancy Clarke

    We should not be expanding airports at all. We must fly less, not more. The planet is suffering a climate and ecological crisis and more flying will only increase CO2 emissions. The government’s own... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail Infrastructure Limited)

    1. We act for Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail) and have been instructed to submit relevant representations on its behalf. As a statutory undertaker affected by the proposed DCO we... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Neville Bulgin

    Gatwick’s expansion opponents have calculated that if the expansion plans were to be enacted in full their CO2 emissions would rise by over 50% and generate 5.5% of all UK CO2 emissions by 2038. It’s... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Oliver Davies

    Your plan should not be advertised as Northan runway. you only have an emergency runway. it's policy is flawed. it will be disruptive to the wider community with only a short term gain due to it... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Patricia Lycett

    The noise pollution is unbearable at present and this will significantly add to it

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Patrick David Cahill

    One runway at Gatwick is sufficient Infrastructure could not cope with more road and rail traffic Noise level already unbearable - more would be a disaster A new runway would add to the existing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Paul Bryant

    The extra runway at Gatwick, would be far better than the third runway, and would cost considerably less, as part of the second runway is already in place, it would also reduce the impact on the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Paul Charnaud

    The blight on all property values in the area is terrible. My house can not be sold at its full value because of the planning application

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Paul Lovatt-Smith

    I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – · Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Paul Whitehouse

    I wish to oppose the planned project on the following grounds:- 1. Extra air traffic will increase carbon emissions which will have a direct effect on pollution and hence drive climate change. We need... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Peacehaven & District Chamber of Commerce (Peacehaven & District Chamber of Commerce)

    Additional noise and congestion are a concern.

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Petrina Voelcker

    If the application to use a second runway is given permission to go ahead I fear that the potentially massive increase in air traffic will have a deleterious effect on the surrounding area. There is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Philip Goddard

    The noise pollution and air quality reduction caused by the existing volume of aircraft movements, and traffic/parking problems caused by the existing number of airline passengers, already has a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Pootings Residents Association (Pootings Residents Association)

    Pootings Residents Association (PRA) represents over 60 members and their families who live in Pootings and the surrounding areas of Crockham Hill and Mapleton Road situated in Green Belt land in the... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Ramblers (Sussex Area) (Ramblers (Sussex Area))

    Sussex Ramblers oppose Gatwick Airport’s application for a northern runway for the following reasons. 1. The applicant claims that it is a development of an existing runway but Gatwick does not have 2... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Richard Butler

    I have lived in Edenbridge since 1969 (54 years). I have witnessed the ever increasing noise and pollution as a result of the continued growth of Gatwick traffic. The main aircraft traffic travels... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Richard Heis

    The large population that is affected by this planned measure, has seen a significant increase in flights since Covid, which seem to carry on later and later into the evening. Gatwick have... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Robert Charles Clay

    Further expansion of Gatwick goes against all the UK's commitments to reach net zero. Air travel is unsustainable. Transport policy needs to change to reduce the number of flights to and from the UK,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Robert Duggan

    I object to expansion of Gatwick airport. It is inconsistent with the UK govt. declaration of a Climate Emergency; It will worsen traffic congestion in the area; It will worsen noise and air... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Roger Easton

    Noise pollution. Environmental Pollution. Won't help UK meet net Zero targets

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • BNP Paribas Real Estate (BNP Paribas Real Estate) on behalf of Royal Mail (Royal Mail)

    Royal Mail (RM) does not have an in principle objection to the Gatwick Airport Northern Runway DCO proposals but is seeking to secure mitigations to protect its operations during the construction and... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Ruth Margaret Sweet

    My concern relating to Gatwick airport expansion plans

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Sandra Jean Mortimer

    Noise impact on my day to day life. Pollution impact on my day to day life. Pollution impact over whole area. Decline in air quality. Significantly more aircraft noise. My home is under the flight... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Sarah Witheridge

    The airport is big enough. It is already extremely noisy for residents every morning and evening.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Sharon Taylor

    I support the application for the Northern runway at Gatwick Airport.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Shere Parish Council (Shere Parish Council)

    This is a provisional response from Shere Parish Council and is subject to ratification or amendment by the full council. The parish of Shere, particularly the hills in the southern section of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Shirley Wise

    I am totally opposed to the Gatwick expansion on many grounds. The first objection will be yet more horrendous noise from the planes themselves, I hear them now every day and every night and during... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Simon Gill

    The introduction of PRNAV has had a significant detrimental effect to our quality of life due to increased aircraft noise. Departure Routes 3 and 4 both fly over our home and in addition we are... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Simon Witheridge

    Will be detrimental to the local area.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Stephanos Panayi

    Apposed to 2nd runway. For a quieter and green future.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Stephen East

    Concerns about increased aircraft movements and associated noise especially night time flights

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Stephen Lark

    I object to the further development of Gatwick Airport. We live in a rural area of West Kent and already suffer from an excessive amount of noise from Gatwick’s operations from taking off and landing.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Stephen Nigel McDonald

    I have huge concerns about the growth in CO2 emissions as a result of Gatwick expansion, estimated to rise from the 2019 figure of 281,000 aircraft movements to 318,000 aircraft movement by the time... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Stephen Short

    I object to this application by Gatwick Airport for a second runway. We already suffer with unreasonable aircraft noise and disturbance and a second runway would increase this significantly. It is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Steven Paul Birch

    To enable the runway will lead to increase car traffic both within the local area and on the motorways M25 and M23, this will be driven by extra passenger journeys to the airport and additional staff... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Stewart Berrymen

    I object to the Gatwick expansion proposal

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Valerie Barbara Cahill on behalf of Sunhill South Godstone RTM Co. Ltd (Sunhill South Godstone RTM Co. Ltd)

    [Redacted] which is managed by the Sunhill South Godstone RTM Co Ltd is a house built in the 1890's now converted into six dwellings. It is directly in the flight path when taking off to the East and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Susan Cash

    We already suffer from excess noise with aircraft flying over, particularly under certain weather conditions. Any increase in flights will spoil the beauty of this area for walkers and others seeking... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Susan Mitchell

    I strongly object to Gatwick Airport’s proposed addition of a 2nd runway, mainly in view of the anticipated increase in aircraft noise and the impact on climate change and air pollution. We live near... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • T G Gourlay

    Yes, I understand the need for more runways, but I am also concerned about the level of noise and air pollution. Having lived, and worked, directly beneath the flight path in the past, it is very hard... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Stephen Maurice Bird (Stephen Maurice Bird) on behalf of The Bird-Hellsten Family (The Bird-Hellsten Family)

    We are about 20 miles from Gatwick. We moved here 20 years ago knowing of the noise from aircraft. We have learned to cope and are grateful for some degree of respite by the use of alternative... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • The Stirling Family

    From: Jeremy & Valerie Stirling (Redacted) To: The Gatwick Expansion Consultation advisory Committee Web address:... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • TUI (TUI)

    TUI Airways is one of Gatwick's largest airlines operating short, mid and long-haul flights to leisure destinations around the Europe and the rest of world. Our interest in the project is around the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Valerie Barbara Cahill

    [Redacted] is already inconvenienced by noise from existing runway usage, expanding to two runways would increase the aircraft traffic noise extensively. The flight path is already full to capacity... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Martyn Warr (Martyn Warr) on behalf of Warr family (Warr family)

    We object to this proposal. Our main objection is about the inevitable increase in noise pollution. We live under the flight path of Gatwick. The increase in traffic in recent years, which we... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Wizz Air (Wizz Air)

    London Gatwick is constrained in terms of capacity, therefore this scheme, if approved, would allow additional capacity to be released to the benefit of airlines and passengers.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 October 2023

  • Adrian Maurice

    The expansion of the runway facilities at Gatwick should not be permitted. Grounds for refusal of the application are: The economic case made by Gatwick is flawed with a material increase in working... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Alan Chilvers

    This application should be rejected as additional runway at Gatwick only benefits the applicants shareholders and management team, clear submissions from respected consultants have provided crystal... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Alan Douglas

    I do not want an extra runway at Gatwick

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Alan J White

    I am concerned about the effect the flying of jets is having on global warming. Not only is there the carbon output there is the effect of hot jet exhaust heating the upper atmosphere. The other major... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Alison Margaret Savage

    We live under the fight path of planes coming in to land. There are already landings every few minutes and in peak season this is even worse with night flights as well so we are often disturbed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Allan John Bailey

    Pollution.. Infrastructure. Conservation.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Amalie Bennett

    I wish to strongly object to the proposed expansion of Gatwick with the development of a second runway. 1.Rail Infrastructure. Govia Thameslink Railway – which includes Southern, Thameslink and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Amanda Schryver

    I am opposed to the second runway for the following reasons: The impact on our rural road network will only serve to increase congestion which is already severe especially when there are any issues on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Andrew Dore

    Gatwick does not require a second runway. Air travel is reducing not expanding It would be change the existing emergency runway If Gatwick is to get a second runway the existing owners/board members... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Andrew Welsh

    I currently live under the flightpath and find it hard to believe how the introduction of a second runway will do anything but negatively impact the local environment through both increased noise and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Anna Heis

    I oppose the runway on the grounds that air travel should be reducing and increasing capacity of airports poses an enormous threat to current and future generations.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Anne Pearl Zeall

    I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Annette Hards

    Our house is under the flight path to the east of Gatwick, and the noise nuisance, in particular during the night, is very disturbing and intrusive, causing considerable loss of sleep to the detriment... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Anthony Barry Morse

    As residents of [REDACTED], near Edenbridge, we consider ourselves fortunate to live in a part of the UK which has so many areas of protected countryside and historic buildings. Noise pollution of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Anthony Shamash

    The idea of putting another runway into operation when we are all trying to reduce emissions is a joke. To create more noise and pollution over thousands of houses in order to increase a corporation's... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Antonella Barnes

    Hello All, I live only ten minutes from Gatwick Airport. Since moving to Crawley Down in 1998, the traffic I am experiencing in my road alone has changed immensely, and largely because people commute... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Attilia Page

    I am alarmed at proposals to increase air traffic from Gatwick. There is already too much noise pollution overhead due to existing plane departures and arrivals from and to Gatwick. Any escalation... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Ben Dreux

    I oppose the expansion because I am anti climate change.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • C Hill

    Additional aircraft noise in Surrey Hills AONB Huge increase in flights & night flights (noise, vibration) over Surrey Hills GreenBelt and AONB Huge increase in air pollution Increase carbon emissions... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Carol Lesley Hewson

    Dramatically increased flight Increased noise levels Increased night flights and noise pollution

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Caroline Ansell MP

    I wish to write in support of the proposals to develop the Northern Runway at Gatwick Airport in my capacity as the Member of Parliament for Eastbourne & Willingdon. My constituency's economy relies... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Caroline Prebble

    Increased traffic and road traffic noise. Charlwood village is already busy and is used as a cut through to horley and Crawley. Increased aircraft noise, planes flying closer to/over my property. The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Catherine Burgess

    I object to the expansion for the following reasons; 1. Noise - When we moved here in 2009 we were aware of aircraft noise but not to the extent that we have been in the last 10 years with significant... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Catherine Fleming

    I could not take any more planes, noise, disruption and misery. Another runway would be too much for our communities to take. Summer is already a nightmare with much bigger planes than before flying... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Catherine Shea

    The main issues are: the increase in aircraft noise and its detrimental impact on the quality of life in the area; the increase in air pollution and its detrimental effects on our health and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Chris Green

    • Gatwick’s expansion and the environmental impact of more frequent flights and the consequent increase in aircraft noise resulting from a greater number of overhead flights would have substantial... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Claire Catterall

    I strongly object to the building of a second runway at Gatwick. I live directly under the flightpath and flights in and out of Gatwick already blight the day to day experience of living in an are of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Claire Elizabeth West

    Unacceptable levels of noise that impact day to day life and disrupt sleep Planes coming in to land much lower than they should

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Claud Stephen Cecil Gurney

    These are all the normal comments. At Penshurst we used to have some respite when planes took off in the other direction on the Southern runway but, since some changes a few years ago we seem to be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Daniel Meredith Jones

    I am concerned about flight paths concentrated over penshurst. The historic lack of transparency by Gatwick in previous consultations on flight paths (they did not reveal proposed routes); the ability... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Darren Hicklin

    No objection due to acoustic barriers already in place and aircraft much quieter. I live 1.5miles from runway and no disruption to life even at peak times. Fully support due to benefits for local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • David Anthony Slater

    I oppose the proposed project because: 1. It would impose significant additional noise around the airport and under the flight paths. We already experience material noise from Gatwick flights and this... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • David Gill

    I think it is a great opportunity for jobs & growth in the local community as well as a wider supply chain.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • David Griffith-Jones

    This proposed expansion of air traffic is unnecessary and quite inappropriate. It would be environmentally damaging and would add yet further intrusion/blight on the lives of those living under the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • David Hall

    The impact any expansion at Gatwick will have on the lives of us who live in its shadow and under current flight paths and also the negative impact any expansion of Gatwick will have on the climate.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • David Langcaster Smith

    I could go into lots of detail about emmisions, flooding (downstream of the river Mole for instance), pollution, effects of massive traffic increases,etc. But at the end of the day is the fact that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • David Lough

    The sound and emissions of aeroplanes on the eastern approach to Gatwick already have an unwelcome impact on our daily life - aircraft are making their final turns over Oenshurst and are supposed to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • David Murray

    I object to Gatwick Airports application to expand. Aircraft noise & pollution benefits no one, and should be avoided. The additional road traffic cannot be adequately catered for without significant... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Deborah Clarke

    I am wholeheartedly against Gatwick's attempts to effectively build a second runway. Moving to the countryside 20 years ago to live in an AONB was a lifestyle choice. The noise from Gatwick has become... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Donna Acott

    I strongly believe the expansion of Gatwick Airport should not move forward for the following reasons: Health With an airport expansion, communities will suffer substantially increased noise impacts.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Duncan Beagley

    The proposal would have a huge impact on our community for many generations. Expansion would be environmentally damaging, the potential employment and economic benefits can only be considered fully... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Edward Nicholas Heesom

    1. Planes fly over our property on most westerly direction landings. 2. Noise is worst during summer months when people sleep with they windows open. 3. A second runway will DOUBLE the number of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Elaine King

    This would be an environmental disaster for all ecology and local residents. Noise pollution, traffic pollution, green fields destroyed! Where will it all end!?! Please say no! Too loud. Unfair on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Elaine Richardson

    We moved to Tonbridge 36years ago and the volume of aircraft has increased significantly during this period. The flight approach to the airport already causes noise and pollution, as planes frequently... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Elizabeth Heis

    I am opposed to bringing the second runway at Gatwick into commercial use. Doing so and thereby increasing the number of flights from Gatwick will have a significant impact on me and my family as we... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Esther Streeter

    At this time of trying to achieve 'net zero' no airport should be expanding. There are too many flights a day now, doubling them should not be necessary. The air is polluted enough already and flights... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Francine Juliet Blythe

    I object to the proposed second runway at Gatwick the noise from which will have a direct negative impact on my health and wellbeing as well as blighting the lives of generations to come through its... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Gail Brownrigg

    There will be excessive impact on residents in the area. There will be considerable impact on the road infrastructure if more passengers and freight go through Gatwick. In view of climate change.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • George Harding-Rolls

    We are living through the beginnings of a climate crisis which will severely affect both the UK and the rest of the world. To be considering expansion of an airport precisely when we should be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Georgina Stober

    My family moved to the area we live, as an AONB, to enjoy just that. Instead, we are blighted constantly by the hateful planes that go over us at seemingly all hours of the day and night. Why, oh why,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Geraldine Byrne

    My sleep is disturbed severley now by the overflights either late at night or in the early hours of the morning. As the number of flight is likely to double if the runway is approved I am extremely... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Gillian Smyth

    I think it is dangerous to use the emergency runway for regular flights. Increasing the number of flights will result in even more chaos around the airport with queues of vehicles trying to get into... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023

  • Graham Charles De Baerdemaecker

    I live under the flight path of aircraft landing at Gatwick from the west. Although probably quieter than planes taking off they are still noisy. That noise is significant in what is otherwise a quiet... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 23 October 2023