Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
The road will cause much damage to the historical site, and to wildlife, especially breeding birds.
-
Damage to world heritage site.
-
Cannot and will not believe that it is necessary to tunnel under a world heritage site to improve this road. Another solution just has to be found or leave road as is.
-
The scheme will cause irreparable and unwanted damage to a unique World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, which is described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. It will destroy the...
Read more
-
It is very likely this project would result in serious damage to the most important Neolithic archaeological site in England, and one of the most important in the world. This project cannot make sense...
Read more
-
I am worried that our unique World Heritage Site at Stonehenge is about to be irreparably damaged for short term traffic management purposes. I am also concerned that, as a country, we are not...
Read more
-
I'm am very concerned due to the impact this will have on wildlife, local traffic and for me personally, the damage to a world heritage site. Being a practising pagan, there are no other places like...
Read more
-
I object to this application as it will not solve the traffic problem on the A303 near Stonehenge and will irreparably damage the archaelogical site near Stonehenge. The ancient site of Blick Mead has...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the planning proposal (Planning Inspectorate Reference: TR010025) which would involve putting a dual carriageway through the World Heritage Site which currently exists around...
Read more
-
I am appalled that this dual carriageway and tunnel is even being proposed on this ancient site of such archaeological importance. Even UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go...
Read more
-
The fact that Highways England has not considered any alternatives to its current, controversial plan suggests that its tactic will be to use its superior financial strength to force its design...
Read more
-
There will be irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. There should be some changes to the layout before plans go ahead, one...
Read more
-
I object to the A303Stonehenge Stonehenge because:
It will cause damage to this WHS that can never be restored. As UNESCO has said, ‘it’s a landscape without parallel.’ This A303Stonehenge seems to...
Read more
-
I strongly object to the construction of the stone henge tunnel and flyover, for the following reasons.
1 I am concerned about further damage to the Blick Mead mesolithic site, which has already...
Read more
-
As a world heritage sight Stonehenge should be preserved and protected at all costs. It has stood for many years and should continue to do so until it returns to dust naturally not to build a...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the threat of irreparable damage to one of the planet's best known and unique World Heritage Sites, not only its archaeology, but also its setting. Stonehenge has been described...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage Site and the most important archaeological site in this country. I, therefore, object to the A303 Stonehenge Expressway on the following grounds:-
1 The irreparable...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed scheme due to the damaging effects it would have on archaeology, wildlife, and the public.
It would destroy much vital evidence about the landscape in which the site is...
Read more
-
The proposed road development around Stonehenge would cause serious and irreparable damage to the prehistoric landscape and archaeology in the area. This world heritage site is still not fully...
Read more
-
Better not to further damage this site. A new road should be constructed well away from this historic site and wider historic landscape. The existing road should be closed. Only to be used as access...
Read more
-
I object the currently proposed A303 Expressway expansion due to the following reasons:
1. There will be physical harm (akin to vandalism, is it wasn't approved) to the Stonehenge World Heritage...
Read more
-
•Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
•UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
There is absolutely no need for any interference in the road system as it stands. The hold ups are not every hour, every day. There are far worse hold ups every day along the A303 to and from the West...
Read more
-
This project will cause environmental damage, in particular to the World Heritage site. Alternative options must be considered
-
I fully believe that this act will be detrimental to both a valued and ancient monument as well as destroying valuable research in nearby sites, jeopardizing future historical discoveries.
-
I am objecting to thew proposed development of the A303 for a number of reasons. They are:
It will be outrageously destructive to the historical and ecological environment.
Most importantly the...
Read more
-
I am horrified that we are considering jeopardizing the irreplaceable surrounds of Stonehenge - where records of our ancient human and natural history are still to be discovered by future technologies...
Read more
-
This is a very sacred place to the whole of the UK and a great tourist attraction and building this road will damage the area and make it less attractive to visitors
-
We should not compromise the environment of a world heritage site or its environs which is tantamount to cultural vandalism.
Additionally, local wildlife, particularly rare birds , will be adversely...
Read more
-
I object to this proposal.
Stonehenge is just one of the features in the wider Stonehenge landscape. The proposed work would irreparably damage the landscape. This landscape has been preserved by...
Read more
-
I have used the A303 for a long time when travelling from Cornwall to my family in Guildford. I am very worried that the proposed tunnel and new road will damage the World Heritage Site with...
Read more
-
Just another nail in the coffin of humanity. Our successors will never understand such damage. Now would be a great time to start protecting meaningful long term value and stop knee-jerk destructions....
Read more
-
I object to the proposed A303 expressway construction on the grounds that it is likely to cause irreparable damage to a number of the stones, vthe surrounding wildlife & also therfore people visiting...
Read more
-
This idea seems to pose a great threat to the area that surrounds one of our most famous landmark.
It saddens me that such such a disruptive scheme could get the 'go ahead'.
It makes me wonder if...
Read more
-
As a local, I'm against this development because I feel the site should not be developed further as it . Its an ancient site, which should be treated with caution and respect. Preliminary work has...
Read more
-
1. There has been insufficient consultation to discuss alternative solutions that would not damage the World Heritage Site.
2. UNESCO has described it as a "landscape without parallel" and it would...
Read more
-
In my opinion, the planned route will disturb our most important historical monument.
-
Concern about irreparable damage caused to a World Heritage Site, and Blick Mead.
UNESCO advisers against present scheme.
Lack of alternative options.
-
I am dyslexic so pls forgive any miss phrasing or spelling, this is the best I can do.
The risk of damage to the site and the wider environment has already been proven even by its advocates to be...
Read more
-
I am very concerned at the possibility of damage to one of our iconic historical sites, and have read that UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in this way. . The...
Read more
-
Appalling damage to a World Heritage Site which has impacted on my view of the world and of life all my life. I used to visit it when I was child when we could just wander round freely. It has...
Read more
-
I can't believe this plan which prioritizes a road over this ancient historic site - we, the public and future generations deserve better as does the preservation of Stonehenge. The plan, which is...
Read more
-
The scheme being considered would be extremely damaging to the World Heritage Site of Stonehenge. Any damage so caused would not be reversible.
-
I am deeply concerned about further destruction and disruption of our oldest and most important historical landmark. It sets a precident suggesting that sites of historic value, special scientific...
Read more
-
Stonehenge and it's environs are irreplaceable and we don't have the right to damage it, especially for short term ends.
-
As one of the world's most important historic sites the scheme seems to me to be an appalling intrusion and an act of irreversible vandalism to what has been a sacred site since prehistory .
I live...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an historical site, and should not be damaged by the building of a huge
dual carriageway. I understand that this section of the 303 causes a traffic jam but surely you can build this...
Read more
-
This is a site of unique archaeological and historical interest which will be irreparably damaged by the proposed road development. The importance of Stonehenge is recognised by its status as a World...
Read more
-
My reasons for objecting to this scheme are
1. Damage to a world heritage site.
2. Damage to the environment
3. Damage to wild life.
4. The amount of money it will cost.
-
I have close friends in the area and have been visiting Stonehenge all my life. This proposal will cause irreparable damage to this World Heritage Site in its incomparably beautiful setting – and as...
Read more
-
Much more research must be carried out before this site should even be thought about for this sort of developement we still know nothing of what it was used for and why. The developement will destroy...
Read more
-
The open space surrounding Stonehenge is part of the whole site - to damage it would be to damage Stonehenge.
Secondly, Stonehenge has great dignity, which can only be appreciated in peace and...
Read more
-
The area is part of a World Heritage Site. Signifcant headway has been made in recent years in terms of archaeological investigation and we are finally beginning to grasp a greater understanding of...
Read more
-
I believe that the proposal is unethical and morally wrong in that stonehenge was gifted to all the people for their pleasure an apriciation not for the few to view at and exorbitant cost.
-
I have great interest in conserving the beauty of our British heritage, and my opinion is that the A303 dual carriageway and tunnel scheme would irreparably, and negatively change the archeology of...
Read more
-
1) Irreparable damage to the UNESCO World Heritage site. UNESCO opposes the current proposal.
2) Severe damage to the habitat of rare bird species.
3) Increased traffic - both volume and speed, both...
Read more
-
I am in fundamental disagreement with this unaffordable road enlargement scheme. Better alternatives have apparently not been properly investigated and evaluated.
-
I am writing to object that this proposed fails to meet it objective in reducing congestion on the A303, it will simply transfer the congestion creating new bottle necks at the roundabout that feed...
Read more
-
I have the strongest objection to the plans because they will damage a World Heritage site and displace (or worse) rare and valuable wildlife species.
-
The disturbance to the archaeology landscape will be irreversible. As a retired Military Archaeologists I realise that even the surface may have hidden archaeology such as tenuous remains of the WW1...
Read more
-
I regularly visit Stonehenge and travel in the surrounding areas. A diversion of the A303 either by tunnel or overland in the immediate vicinity of Stonehenge would
1. Potentially damage with...
Read more
-
- Where are alternative options in consultation that aren't damaging to a Unesco World Heritage Site
- What about certain damage to the Blick Mead Mesolithic site?
- WHS will be damaged, this is a...
Read more
-
I object to this road scheme because the whole of the area surrounding Stonehenge is of historic importance and the scheme as planned would destroy much which can never be replaced.
-
Stonehenge is a valuable part of our heritage and should be protected.
The proposed road is in an inappropriate location far too close to Stonehenge.
I object to this planning proposal.
-
Dear Sirs,
I am most perturbed by your intentions to build a highway so close to Stonehenge. This is an ancient site that is tremendously meaningful to many, many people. To say nothing of the...
Read more
-
I understand from various experts that this development will cause irreversible damage to prehistoric sites of national and international importance. I feel particularly concerned about this as a...
Read more
-
My concerns regarding the proposed changes to the A303 route in the Stonehenge area are many. As a World Heritage Site and a place of supreme importance to so many people from numerous nations beside...
Read more
-
Don't destroy this sacred site. Once it is gone it is gone forever. Digging under it will csuse immeasurable harm to artifacts buried by time.
-
Why not just make it a dual carriageway. With a tunnel, no-one will be able to see the stones unless they pay to go in. This is a PUBLIC amenity not a fund raiser for the NT/EH.
This is a major...
Read more
-
These are my reasons for objecting to this abhorant suggestion:
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s...
Read more
-
I represent myself as a concerned human being with an interest in preserving sites of enormous culture value to future generations.
-
I believe that the proposal will cause irreparable damage to this unparalleled site which will be unable to be undone. International advisors from UNESCO say the plan shouldn't go ahead and there are...
Read more
-
My interest is in preserving this internationally important site and all historic artifacts on it as a historic resource of the highest importance. Any activity that threatens to disrupt the important...
Read more
-
It is an outrage that any governing authority believes it appropriate to disregard our heritage! You have no right what so ever! You believe you can do what you want to the people and the land, well...
Read more
-
Please reject the proposals. They will have a very damaging effect on this unique monument.
-
I am deeply concerned that the proposed works will cause irreparable damage to this internationally important World Heritage Site, which has been described by UNESCO as a "landscape without parallel."...
Read more
-
I am against the building of the A303 Expressway at Stonehenge.
The character of Stonehenge is peace and tranquility, it brings about feelings of connection to the past when humanity paid much more...
Read more
-
As an archaeologist and visitor to the west country throughout my 73 years, I object to this proposal to remove the historic view of the stones from the A303, which is a major feature of this historic...
Read more
-
The scale of the new roads and associated earthworks and tunnels is nothing short of neo-brutalism on such a sensitive , world heritage site.
-
STONEHENGE was originally built and inhabited by the Dravidians, the first civilisation on Earth, assisted by Aliens.
The head of my organisation, Yogi Tamby Chuckravanen, a descendant of the...
Read more
-
I object due to the disruption & disturbance to rare & local bird life
The damage more traffic will do to an outstanding British World Heritage Site
The surrounding area still could offer up...
Read more
-
The proposed route will devastate a site unique in size and importance. A site which must be preserved for generations to come so the history already discovered can be handed down and further...
Read more
-
I believe that it would be great folly to allow this historical monument of world status importance to be tampered with in any way and it must surely be left alone as no one knows how much historical...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the potential for irreversible damage to this World Heritage Site by the road construction plans.
I believe wildlife and the immediate environment in general would be...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage Site and is of Special interest for archaeology and history around the globe. I strongly object to the proposal of building any sort of tunnel or anything that damages...
Read more
-
I object to this scheme on the grounds that it will
a, damage irreparably the archaeology, water table and ecology of the area
b, damage the habitat of curlews and greater bustards
c, damage Blick...
Read more
-
I am concerned that tunnelling under Stonehenge will destroy crucial elements of the wider WorldHeritagesite, will potentially destabilise the stones and as disrespectful and intrusive on a site of...
Read more
-
As a senior Druid, (I speak for a large number of Druids) having worked in and around The Stonehenge Landscape for more than thirty years;
Having attended many planning meetings, applications and...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the site and setting of Stonehenge and Blick Mead as a UNESCO heritage site.
UNESCO are against this tunnel going ahead.
It will cut the site off from the road, giving...
Read more
-
1.International specialists from UNESCO’s World Heritage Centre and ICOMOS have advised against the scheme; while UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee in 2018 urged the government to explore less...
Read more
-
I object to the scheme for the reasons below:
It will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without...
Read more
-
De voorgenomen aanleg van de weg zal mijns inziens onherstelbare schade aan het wereld erfgoed veroorzaken met geluidsoverlast voor de natuur, bedreiging van eeuwen oude ecologische systemen. Deze...
Read more
-
My objections are that such works will cause damage to a World heritage site, wildlife will be disturbed including rare bird species and there will be an considerable increase in traffic.
-
UNESCO objects to the irreparable damage that will be done and so do I.
-
While I use the A303 as a route to Devon and am therefore aware of how traffic is affected as it passes Stonehenge I strongly object to the current proposal to improve traffic flow.
The proposal has...
Read more
-
I strongly object to the proposed plan for the highway on A303Stonehenge that has been put forward. Stonehenge is a sacred monument and should be respected as such. The act of building this proposed...
Read more
-
The tunnel will take away a historic view. The only way to to see stonehenge will be to pay a private company a lot of money. This is not fair to people on a low income. It will destroy ancient...
Read more
-
Absolutely unbelievable that this can even be considered. This will cause untold damage to the archaeological remains at Blick Mead.
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage Site and the proposed plans would conflict with its existence.
It is also a unique archaeological site and therefore should be left as it is. If the proposed plans are...
Read more
-
I object to to the proposed plans for a tunnel under the stonehenge landscape. I believe it will do irreparable and as yet unknown damage to this World Heritage Site.