Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I oppose this proposal because of the potential damage it will cause to the Stonehenge Site.
-
I am seriously concerned about the impact of this scheme.
Firstly any new road will generate MORE traffic, causing increased noise from faster traffic and possibly further backing up of traffic in...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the impact of this scheme on this World Heritage Site, its archaeology and its setting. There will also be disturbance arising out of this scheme to rare bird species - Stone...
Read more
-
I am greatly concerned about the impact on one of the most important historical landscapes in this country
-
I am objecting to the Stonehenge Expressway, as I believe it is an act of unacceptable vandalism. It will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. In fact,...
Read more
-
This project is wholly damaging to the Stonehenge landscape - a WHS described by UNESCO as ‘landscape without parallel’ and whose Directors state that the project should NOT go ahead in it's present...
Read more
-
That this development causes irreversible archaeological and environmental damage to one of our most important heritage sites.
-
Over the last 18 years I have followed the discussion about the changes to the A303 with interest.
The current proposals will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site, not only to the...
Read more
-
The scheme does not safeguard the archaeology of the site. Stonehenge should still be visible from the road and is an attractive sight to behold. A scheme to dual the existing road on slightly raised...
Read more
-
My parents used to live in Devon, while I lived in Bristol and other parts of the U.K. so I used to regularly drive past Stonehenge. Stonehenge was and is a most impressive landmark and a part of our...
Read more
-
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to express my utmost disagreement with the continuation of the work of Highways England at the Stonehenge site, as I believe it is causing irreperable damage to the...
Read more
-
I object to the planned changes as they will damage a site of great archeological importance. They will cut off the view of Stonehenge from the road, forcing people to pay for the privilege of seeing...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is our heritage from our ancester, so much is still waiting for us to learn and rediscover the wisdom and knowledge behind it. This is a site of important power for the people, the earth...
Read more
-
I have visited the site of Stonehenge many times in my 70 odd years. Now I live in Devon I use the A303 often when going to visit relatives in London. I really love driving past the site and seeing...
Read more
-
This is another wholly unacceptable putsch by the gombeen road lobby ~ the irriots have already by accident or design destroyed much of Blick Mead and now are set to do irredeemable damage to all of...
Read more
-
I am objecting to the proposed scheme since in my opinion, this will cause irreparable damage to this World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed changes on the following grounds:
Irreparable damage to a unique World Heritage site and it's environs at Bick. Some damage has been done already.
Risks to local flaura and...
Read more
-
I feel that this will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, which is described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ and I don't feel that the alternative options...
Read more
-
My main concern is that there may already have been, and it is likely that in future there will be, damage to an archaeological site that is a national monument. It seems that we have much to learn...
Read more
-
This is destroying our human heritage and must stop now. We don't want the land disturbed as it has been or our relics destroyed.
-
As a user of the A303 and a respecter of history, I urge the government to fund a LONG, low tunnel between Countess Roundabout (at ground level) and far west of Longbarrow roundabout so that none of...
Read more
-
This scheme is ill thought out and has been proposed as the cheapest possible solution to a very delicate problem in an area of world importance and significance.
The tunnel must be made...
Read more
-
My representation will be on behalf of the archaeological destruction, of features and deposits of international importance, that will take place in relation to the scheme.
-
I am an interested party. I am concerned about the impact of the road changes A303 on the world unesco site of Stonehenge and the wider archaeological area. I understand that the site has already been...
Read more
-
I object to any works that will endanger the safety and environment of Stonehenge
-
The advances made in archeological techniques and therefore knowledge in the last generation has been extraordinary. In another generation we will know more, much more about the culture and history of...
Read more
-
The proposed development will damage this very important cultural and archaeological site and also.posesba risk to.protected bird species.
-
I strongly object to A303 Stonehenge Expressway. The main reasons for my objection are:
•According to all archaeology experts that I am aware of, the construction of this road will cause irreparable...
Read more
-
I am registering as I have been following this for some time now and am appalled by the proposal and by the processes being followed. The proposal is clearly both unnecessary and extremely...
Read more
-
please drop this ridiculus unnecessary road tunnel scheme,just make the short stretch of single lanes into dual carriageway and let it be !! yours chris ford
-
My primary concern is the integrity of the World renowned Heritage site which has been acknowledged by UNESCO as well as numerous other parties. Sentiment also stacks with this, given it is a symbol...
Read more
-
UNESCO have described the ancient landscape including and surrounding Stonehenge as a "landscape without parallel". They do not believe that the scheme should go ahead in its current form and I agree...
Read more
-
Cycling UK wishes to ensure that the proposed scheme eliminates the existing severance issues for cyclists along this section of the A303 and that it does not create new severance. In particular we...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the proposed expressway will cause serious damage to the WHS and its landscape settling. One of the key aspects of the Stonehenge environs is the high density and quality of...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a monument of international importance.
It has been reported that the wider site has already been damaged by workmen.
It is outrageous to me that a scheme such as this should be...
Read more
-
I object to the fundamental damage to the WHS and to the archaeology which future generations may be able to learn more from than we can in 2018.
I object to the loss of the view of the monument...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a UNESCO world heritage site, and I believe that the current proposals will totally ruin this wonderful landscape
-
I am concerned about damage to The World Heritage Site of Stonehenge, disturbance to rare bird nesting sites and also a lack of alternative schemes which would not damage the site.
-
I feel that UNESCO realises of the extraordinary importance of this site, which the Government fails to understand. It is an ENTIRE LANDSCAPE under threat by the proposals. They should not go ahead.
-
Stonehenge and its surroundings are a World Heritage site, unique and of immense importance to many people from around the world. The scheme as it stands would damage this internationally important...
Read more
-
It is patently insane to destroy a site of such archeological importance. This is a World Heritage Site, not a village bypass.
-
I am concerned that this will cause serious damage to the World Heritage Site of Stonehenge which is an ancient and important archaeological site as well as an important site for pagans. UNESCO have...
Read more
-
Having studied the proposed A303 Stonehenge Expressway scheme I would like to raise a number of concerns in relation to this, these being that the scheme:
1. does not meet with the requirements of...
Read more
-
-This is a National Heritage archaeological site of immense importance, it is entirely unique on this earth. There is archaeology still unexcavated, therefore this set should be completely protected...
Read more
-
I wish to express my concern that whatever work is carried out does not damage Stonehenge and the surrounding areas. The whole area is has great historical significance. And any proposed work needs...
Read more
-
I object to this proposal. I believe it will cause irreparable damage to one of the most important historical & spiritual landmarks in our country. It will also have a huge impact on local wildlife....
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a sacred site with sacred energies and sacred rituals. People come from all over the world to enjoy its splendour. The planning intention decreases this sacridity. I believe it will...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the effect of the proposed scheme on the World Heritage Site. We are in danger of losing valuable information about the past due to an ill thought through process, which will...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a sacred site of which also has a burial site and if construction goes ahead everything such as the burial site itself and everything around it will be ruined. And the history of...
Read more
-
Prevent damage to site and wildlife, I object to the noise, loss of view of a world heritage site and possibly paying to view.
-
1. Disturbance of rare bird species (Curlew and Bustard)
2. Loss of view from the road and subsequent need to pay
3. Lack of alternative options in consultation that would not damage the World...
Read more
-
I have listened to Mike Parker Pearson's explanation about why the proposed road changes at Stonehenge are so damaging and wish to register my request that an alternative solution is explored and...
Read more
-
I believe that the current plan will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international...
Read more
-
The scheme as proposed will damage this unique, UNESCO-recognised, archaeological area, merely for the convenience of motor-transport.
-
I object to these plans on the grounds that untold damage will be done to this World Heritage site . I believe that the whole sight should be preserved for future generations & any plans for road...
Read more
-
I object to the A303 Stone Henge Highway,due to my concerns regarding the following issues: permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a...
Read more
-
I am writing to you to protest any developments that affect the Stonehenge World Heritage Site. It is truly a spiritual hub and center of Britain. Driving a tunnel through it is like digging a tunnel...
Read more
-
I object to the plans for the new road at Stonehenge. this world heritage site will be obliterated by this plan. It is a UNESCO site that is so special it must be protected
-
I object to the development of the A303 on the grounds that it will cause irreparable damage to the UNESCO World Heritage site of the landscape surrounding Stonehenge, which we are charged with...
Read more
-
Please do not risk this very special and very sacred site. There has already been one devastating error. Please stop now to prevent more.
You surely do not want to be the government that goes down...
Read more
-
• Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
• UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I believe that the creation of the A303 Expressway will be extremely damaging to the surroundings. Particularly affected would be the Heritage site of Stonehenge, which is a very important cultural,...
Read more
-
I strongly object to the planned irreparable damage to Stonehenge, the archaeology and natural setting, which I love to look at. I object to the current scheme to hide the Stones from view and force...
Read more
-
I strongly oppose anything that damages any area of the Heritage Site of Stonehenge. England has always been applauded and revered around the world for preserving every aspect of it's heritage. The...
Read more
-
Our history and legacy must come first. The Stonehenge monument is one of many special areas of scientific interest in a unique landscape that will be destroyed for ever if a tunnel is allowed to...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the proposed highway changes will significantly impact public enjoyment of the world heritage site at Stonehenge (and will also effect the surrounding landscape and environment),...
Read more
-
I object in the strongest terms to the A303 development proposal at the UNESCO world heritage site of Stonehenge, for the following reasons:
- there will be irreparable damage caused to the WHS, its...
Read more
-
I don't want the expressway or anything to damage the historical site of Stone Henge or make it so you have to pay.
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage Site, which in itself gives kudos to the tourist attraction remaining as is
I'm very concerned that the extensive works would cause damage that would be irreparable to...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site, its setting and archaeology and all that may lie in the surrounding area as yet undiscovered. The economic impact of this loss on tourism.
The loss...
Read more
-
it is sacred ground and a spiritual site surrounding please relocate
-
I am concerned there will be Irreparable damage to Stonehenge, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. In fact UNESCO’s international advisers say the...
Read more
-
I object to the development of the A303 Expressway near the Stonhenge World Heritage Site.
The development of the expressway will cause irreparable damage to the Stonehenge site and...
Read more
-
I have a strong view that developing this road under this very sensitive national heritage site would have a severe impact on the prescious artifacts and remains of our ancestors. This place....
Read more
-
The proposed tunnel will inevitably damage archaeological remains in the vicinity of Stonehenge - it is reported that a test boring has already damaged an artefact.
Simply widening the A303 would...
Read more
-
Having lived in Wiltshire for 40 years I care passionately about its historic sites and its beautiful landscapes, and their significance in providing us with evidence of how past generations from long...
Read more
-
The proposed A303 Expressway under Stonehenge is unacceptable from an environmental point of view. Build a new road somewhere else. You will never be able to repair the damage done to the site and the...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the length of the proposed tunnel is too short and because of this the present scheme wifi damage the World Heritage Site.
I am also concerned that he present proposal is not...
Read more
-
I do not agree with the proposed route of the A303 primarily because of the damage that will be caused to StoneHenge and its surrounding areas. The loss of so much of our heritage is at stake,...
Read more
-
I am extremely concerned about the ongoing highway construction works and planning upon the Stonehenge landscape. It risks immense damage to the preservation of the surrounding area, wildlife...
Read more
-
This is utterly ludicrous. This unique & irreplaceable ancient monument is being damaged, compromised & endangered because of road “improvements”.
It is madness to jeapodise Stonehenge in any way....
Read more
-
The proposed route WILL encroach upon the accepted extent of the World Heritage Site and therefore irreparably damage the site itself
I am very concerned that the UNESCO advisers are very unhappy...
Read more
-
My representation is that only those personally experiencing or having extensive knowledge of the spiritual culture of these islands should decide what should happen and not happen to the sacred sites...
Read more
-
Sacred Sites International Foundation believes that this proposed road development would have an adverse effect on Stonehenge, a remarkable, sacred, UNESCO World Heritage Site and its surrounding...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about road building proposals at the Stonehenge WH site and I want to be kept informed of developments.
-
I strongly feel that the intrusion and possible damage to this unique Mesolithic site would be beyond repair if changes and mistakes are made to this area.This is an important World Heritage site that...
Read more
-
The 1805 Club’s interest is in the history of the Georgian Royal Navy at the time of Lord Nelson. The Nile Clumps were planted soon after the Battle of the Nile in 1798 and there is a risk of...
Read more
-
• Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
• UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I am worried about potential irreparable harm to a global treasure of historical significance to everyone on the planet.
-
That the merits of building a tunnel in the vicinity of the Stonehenge site rather than a cutting have not been adequately financially or environmentally assessed.
The cost of building a tunnel is...
Read more
-
No further damage should be done to the archaeological landscape of Stonehenge.
Road widening should not be at the expense of England’s most iconic World Heritage Site.
If A303 widening at...
Read more
-
Damage to the World Heritage Site is not acceptable. Priority needs to be given to the site, not to vehicles.
-
I think that Stonehenge is under threat from the planned road scheme for the following reasons;
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without...
Read more
-
I understand the need to improve the A303 but I think the cost of constructing a tunnel is unjustified. There are alternatives which will be cheaper, cause less damage to historic remains and be a...
Read more
-
I have two primary concerns. I am deeply worried about the inevitable disturbance of the habitats of stone curlews and recently reintroduced Great Bustards which this development will entail. Secondly...
Read more
-
The planned tunnel through the UNESCO world heritage site of Stonehenge should not go ahead. A world heritage site should not be destroyed it should be protected. The destruction of the platform is a...
Read more
-
Having lived in Wiltshire for many years from the 1970s, I enjoyed the opportunities to visit Stonehenge and give my children an interest in history. Sadly, over the years, access to Stonehenge became...
Read more
-
I object to A303 Stonehenge Expressway. In particular I am concerned about the increased traffic and the noise and air pollution this will cause, and damage to the World Heritage Site and Blick Mead...
Read more
-
I believe that the proposed changes to the A303 will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site of Stonehenge as well as placing the World Heritage Site status in jeopardy.
-
The World Heritage Site needs to be properly protected. Damage to the World Heritage Site is not acceptable.