Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Stonehenge is of huge historical importance, not just for the UK but internationally.
To go ahead with the current plans has the potential to destroy this archaeological site.
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I believe the World Heritage Site, and the historic landscape surrounding it, should be sacrosanct. Less invasive options exist and should be sought at all costs rather than tamper any further with...
Read more
-
This plan will cause Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go...
Read more
-
The scheme proposed is unnecessary. It would be far more sensible to construct, above ground, a dual carriageway to the south of the existing A 303 for westbound traffic.
-
I believe that it is important to preserve humanity's ancient and sacred sites. We can learn much from our ancestors. Much of my ancestry is rooted in the British Isles and I want to see that...
Read more
-
I object to the work as I believe it will damage the landscape and the archeological importance of the site and surrounding areas will be compromised.
-
I am opposed to the road work along A303 that will effect the Stonehenge landscape. I have visited the site repeatedly and have researched the region extensively, included presenting classes at my...
Read more
-
I am opposed to the present plan to tunnel close to Stonehenge as it do serious and irreparable damage to the priceless archaeological heritage of the World Heritage Site. The traffic should be...
Read more
-
Recent archaeological discoveries have revealed that the site is far more complex and extended than previously thought. The road should therefore circumvent this unique part of our heritage. Building...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the UNESCO advisors are not happy for this to go ahead in its present mode.
It's upsetting to me that the view of the Stones would be gone thus making the public pay to see them....
Read more
-
My main concerns with the proposal is the apparent ignoring of advice from UNESCO regarding what is a world heritage site and the potential for irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and...
Read more
-
I consider that the proposed changes to the highways in the vicinity of Stonehenge and across the World Heritage Site will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described...
Read more
-
UNESCO has described this world heritage site as a ‘landscape without parallel’ and said that the scheme should not go ahead in its present form. There is NO good reason for that to be ignored.
-
I am objecting to the significant new road structure which is not appropriate for the area. We must preserve such an incredibly important site and still be able to carry out more ivesstigations of the...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
The scheme will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ and that UNESCO’s own international advisers say...
Read more
-
Dear Sir/ madam ,
I beg of you to consider your actions before causing irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’,
please...
Read more
-
I strongly object to proposed A303 STONEHENGE EXPRESSWAY PLANNING INSPECTORATE REFERENCE TR010025
I am deeply concerned that irreparable damage will be caused to this World Heritage Site and ...
Read more
-
You have failed to follow the expert advice of UNESCO'S international advisors
Stonehenge belongs to the nation I do not see why I should have to pay to see it
-
I wish to register my personal objection to the plan to dig a tunnel under Stonehenge. At the time of my birth, my parents lived in Amesbury, about three miles from Stonehenge, and Stonehenge is part...
Read more
-
From discussing the issue with many people in my local area, and some being archaeologists this decision to make a tunnel will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting. There...
Read more
-
Please note that I object to large scale infrastructure, such as roadworks and tunnel excavation, being carried out near Stonehenge as I am concerned that such works will seriously impact upon and...
Read more
-
The proposal to widen the A303 will damage the archaeology and ecology of this World heritage site. Already too many areas have been damaged by road widening and building in this once green and...
Read more
-
I object to the A303 current proposal due to the irreparable harm and damage it will inevitably cause to a World Heritage Site of unique global significance.
Furthermore the works will seriously...
Read more
-
I object to the A303 expressway through the Stonehenge WHS for several reasons. The Stonehenge WHS, including its famous archaeology, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’, will be...
Read more
-
Something like Stonehenge , is truly unique and mystical. I know it belongs to a distant past, which we today can barely relate to? However going to all that effort, if nothing else warrants our...
Read more
-
The proposed dual carriageway scheme would intrude into the UNESCO World Heritage Site, causing irreversible harm to the scenery, wildlife habitats, geology, and possibly destroy archaeological sites...
Read more
-
It would be a terrible shame in the eyes of history and of the world if this incredible monument were to be damaged in the interests of a building project which is likely to have a very limited...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
Hi,
It’s simple - I am objecting the building of a road that will probably be in use for 100 years or less under and around a site that is world heritage listed and has been present for several...
Read more
-
I am very seriously concerned by the proposal to push a tunnel through a registered site of such importance as the whole Stonehenge area. When a World Heritage site so famed as this is under clear...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the current plans will damage the World Heritage Site particularly the archaeology of the site as set out by the UNESCO report.
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without paralle
-
1.Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
2.UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
Please reconsider this scheme as it currently is not recommend by UNESCO. Neither Does it give sufficient protection to rare birds.
Thanks
-
Apart from the damage that will be done to the WHS itself by the tunnel and other works, I remain convinced that insufficient work has been done on the long term sustainability of the tunnel in terms...
Read more
-
I am very concerned to hear about the proposals for the area around Stonehenge. The damage that this would cause to the environement and wildlife at Stonehenge would be devistating. Once these changes...
Read more
-
I am very concerned by the potential damage done to a unique World Heritage Site: one of the jewels in the United Kingdom's crown. As technology enables new, non-invasive methods of archaeological...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage Site and must be respected as such. This means it needs to stay as original as possible--as it is now! History cannot be replaced. Noise, traffic, disturbed site lines...
Read more
-
1/ The proposed development will cause destabilisation and irreparable damage to an archaeological 'burial' site
2/ Increased noise pollution from faster travelling vehicles
3/ The Stonehenge...
Read more
-
I object to the denial to everyone of the iconic view of a world heritage site that should belong and be available to us, the public, not hidden away for only those who wish to pay to visit.
-
I am a UK citizen presently resident in France.
I see this World Heritage Site as of inestimable value, not just for England, nor even Europe, but for the world entire.
It is meaningless unless...
Read more
-
It would seem that the proposed road development could have a deleterious effect on a major World Heritage site, and quite possibly destroy important archaeological evidence. We are looking at a far...
Read more
-
I object because this proposal is against UNESCO advice, and while threatening irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site as a whole, does not offer alternative safer options. It may also cause...
Read more
-
It is inconceivable to ruin a World Heritage Site any more than it already has been. The construction of A303 Stonehenge Expressway should be avoided at all costs , there would be faster traffic,...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a sacred site that is spiritually connected to the earth it is built on and no new roads should be built anywhere near it, beneath or above ground! The new road should be diverted far...
Read more
-
I am objecting because:
I consider this to be an act of cultural vandalism, the effects of which can never be reversed. Future generations will hold us culpable for the destruction of this unique...
Read more
-
The values are all wrong. We need to care more about our heritage than the speed of traffic
-
1. Stonehenge is a site of international importance.
2. The entire landscape around Stonehenge is part of the monument; especially the Mesolithic site at Blick Mead.
3. Damage to the environment...
Read more
-
Irreversible damage to a sacred sight. Threatening rare bird species in the area.
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage Site. Its archaeology and setting have been described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ This should be protected.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site (WHS), its archaeology is precious and archeology is found beneath the surface the tunnel will destroy it and the wider landscape has not been ‘worked’ by...
Read more
-
I am corncerned that there will be irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting. Stone henge is part of our natural heritage and should be valued and protected.
UNESCO describe it as a...
Read more
-
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form because it may cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by...
Read more
-
The proposed invasive activities in a area, so close to such significant historic monuments, is almost without parallel. Perhaps if a stretch of the A308 were to be made a toll road there would be...
Read more
-
I believe the historical value of Stonehenge will be jeopardized by the building of the A303 Stonehenge Expressway. Once damage is done it cannot be repaired.
-
My personal objections follow UNESCO's description as a "landscape without parallel" and their advice not to proceed with the changes as they stand. I feel we are responsible for our heritage site,...
Read more
-
1. To make sure that executives of the planning process are aware that we still know relatively little concerning the function(s) which required Stonehenge to be located where it is, nor the...
Read more
-
I condemn the A303 dual carriageway and tunnel scheme for introducing a major constructional feature that will dwarf the prehistoric earthworks. What message does that send? That we can afford to lose...
Read more
-
I object to the A303 Expressway due to:
- the permanent damage that will be caused to this unique site, and the local wildlife
- increased traffic / noise / pollution
- apparent lack of interest...
Read more
-
We may have Brexit or Remain a high standing member of The EU in the event of a Second Referendum, but we won't look good in the face of UNESCO.
Many tourists use the route and don't mind waiting to...
Read more
-
As a graduate in archaeology, former field archaeologist and as a UK resident who enjoys visiting the prehistoric sites of England, I am deeply concerned about the proposed scheme. The damage that...
Read more
-
My opinion is a simple one. I treasure our ancient Monument & History. Your planning has ignored the advice of those qualified who have stated the obvious, the potential damage to this Ancient...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I am concerned that these plans will damage a world heritage site with unique archaeology and setting.
UNESCO’s international advisers have stated that they believe that the scheme should not go...
Read more
-
Irrepairable damage to our heritage site, world famous, a national treasure, sacred to the indiginous people, please stop and rethink the route. The money spent on this atrocity should be used to help...
Read more
-
This world heritage site is irreplaceable. I find the proposal unacceptable in its impact on this important site. There must be a better way to accommodate the volume of traffic well away from this...
Read more
-
This idea of defacing a World Heritage site is shaming.
The damage it will do to the site itself and archaeology yet to be discovered. We know so little about the people who used it and lived and...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
This plan makes a mockery of UNESCO recognising the site as of special interest to the whole world. It is outrageous that any one would consider doing anything to denigrade the area.
-
The structures for the planned route would damage irreparably the WHS of Stonehenge as well as impinge upon birdlife in the area. This damage could not be undone. It is a disgrace that this should be...
Read more
-
I appreciate that the traffic running past Stonehenge is increasingly bad but this is one of our most spiritual areas, there are hundreds of burial grounds around and it is appalling that they want to...
Read more
-
I am concerned that any major construction works will damage the integrity of the archaeological features of Stonehenge and the surrounding areas - archaeology is as much about the preservation of...
Read more
-
I wish to express how unhappy I am with the current plans for the A303 Expressway on the Stonehenge World Heritage Site. It is a plan which fails to protect this unique and special site, UNESCO...
Read more
-
I believe that more damage to the ecological and historical site of Stonehenge will be done by building a new road under or past it as is being proposed.
-
I strongly object to the damage the tunnel will inflict on the unique prehistoric landscape including Blick Mead and the area around Stonehenge.
-
This road must be redirected away from Stonehenge to prevent iripairrable damage to the ancient site.
The site is thousands of years old and must be respected and looked after.
-
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am very interested to register as an interested Party to object to the A303 Stonehenge Expressway. I believe it is the least I can do on a personal level to prevent the damage...
Read more
-
This monument is world famous bringing revenue to the local community and onwards how can you even think about disturbing this unique piece of historical importance LEAVE IT ALONE ?
-
The new planned A303 Expressway and tunnel will destroy the current Stonehenge landscape, making the ancient stones look insignificant. It will also damage the Blick Mead Mesolithic site. There has...
Read more
-
I am writing to register my objection to the Stonehenge tunnel plan as it stands.
My main objection is based on the fact that the landscape around Stonehenge is a UNESCO World Heritage Site, and...
Read more
-
I Darren Richard Cox object to any structure, road, tunnel or otherwise that could potentially ruin the landscape ,and overall feel of an ancient monument of such significance as to be awarded a...
Read more
-
This world heritage site must be afforded the highest level of protection. I object to the current favoured plan on the grounds that it falls far short of this objective. Unknown damage will be caused...
Read more
-
To take the view of this great historical monument away from the view of the road will be damaging to the local economy and unfair to any passing family on the A303. It could be all that is needed for...
Read more
-
This planned road & tunnel will wreck the Unesco featured "landscape without parallel".
-
Please reconsider this proposal. It will irreparably damage the landscape of one of the world's most iconic heritage sites (the view of UNESCO) and there are other solutions that will not. For...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the environmental impact on rare birds, damage to a world heritage site and increased traffic flow through this area .
-
I consider the tunneling process to be a damaging act on a world heritage site. It's rationale is unclear and against the wishes of UNESCO. I do not agree with English heritage that covering the road...
Read more
-
I am anxious that this historic site should remain unaltered without encroachment or harm to wild life and birds
-
I am true with the inner circle, know of the works before now and after at this heritage site....
please keep it as it is.
-
I would like to register my objections to the the proposed A303 Expressway. I believe this will cause irreparable damage to a World Heritage Site, potentially undermining the structure of Stonehenge...
Read more
-
It is unbelievable that Highways England are planning to route a dual carriageway
through a World Heritage site. The added disturbance to rare birds such as the Stone Curlew and Great Bustard is...
Read more
-
I have read and understood the above text for the submission of my representation.
I do not feel it is justifiable to disturb or alter the environment surrounding such a historical site of such...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a much loved, iconic, national heritage site. It is one of the jewels in the crown of British history and it is vital that it remains undisturbed as far as possible for inspiration for...
Read more
-
I object to any roadways in the vicinity of Stonehenge due to the potential for damage to our World Heritage Site.
-
The proposed road and attendant works will irreparably destroy parts this Heritage Site - much of which is still undiscovered. There must be an effort to divert the road away from the area completely....
Read more
-
Stone Henge is a world heritage site and should be protected from damage from vehicles passing close by and from vibrations caused by lorries. Not to mention traffic pollution. This also includes the...
Read more
-
I believe there must be a better option that does not damage the precious and unique archaeology and environment of Stonehenge as this proposal does.
-
Stone Henge is a World Heritage Site and together with Avebury is one of the most mysterious sites in the world. Placing such an iconic site at risk of damage, even unintentional, is unforgivable....
Read more