Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I think you need to take into consideration the following in the decision making process for the number of reasons included below;
* Ireparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting,...
Read more
-
Proposed tunnel too short. MODhave to give up land to create much wider ring road to restore the whole processional landscape around the henge.
-
I feel that the work will put this, the most important World Heritage Site in the UK in utmost danger, as well as neighbouring sites, and also it will devastate the buzzard and curlew population in...
Read more
-
I'm very concerned that the route and structure has not been assessed enough to ensure that there isn't any damage to the historical landscape! The main area I'm aware of is Blick's Mead. This is our...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage site, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO also find the scheme to be unsuited to such a landscape. They should not be ignored. Highways...
Read more
-
This planning inspectorate must study the long term effects of any short tunnel as it will damage prime unevaluated land and prehistoric sites.
-
Having visited the site on several occasions I cannot see why the proposed dual carriageway cannot be moved much further from the site, as it not just Stonehenge but tumuli that are part of the...
Read more
-
1.As a UNESCO World Heritage Site (WHS), Stonehenge is one of the world’s most important prehistoric sites. It is situated in the UK but the UK’s responsibilities lie well beyond the UK, which must...
Read more
-
A tunnel and dual carriageway across Stonehenge World Heritage Site would cause untold damage to a unique and ancient landmark of our history. Stonehenge is not even fully understood, if we further...
Read more
-
It is a huge mistake to disrespect the land of our ancestors in such a way. I'm sure there are ways around it. The site and its surroundings must be prioritised and not a motorway. We will become our...
Read more
-
This is a UNESCO World Heritage site that will be irreparably damaged, along with other important sites, not all of which have been fully excavated. It hampers views from some of the stones, the...
Read more
-
Our roots and history must be preserved at all costs. It is a scandal to risk damaging a world patrimony for the immediate satisfaction of one spoilt generation - a scandal, and also a big...
Read more
-
The landscape and setting of the World Heritage site Stonehenge is unique. The proposed development of the A303 would irreparably damage the visual setting of not only Stonehenge but also other...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is precious to the UK. We can't afford to lose or damage this ancient structure. Do not build a dual carriage way or tunnels near this site.
-
I am opposed to the loss of a precious cultural asset, the classic view of the stones, at the hands of the very bodies entrusted with its protection.
-
This is a World Heritage site. There does not appear to be alternatives that do not impact on the site.
As it has been there for millenia, there is a whole ecosystem which would be threatened,...
Read more
-
I am writing to register my objection to the A303 Expressway on the Stonehenge World Heritage Site, my reasons are many fold and varied, but in the main contain a sense of responsibility for something...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the irreperable damage the plans will cause to a Workd Heritage Site. I am a regular user of the A303 and love being able to see the stones as I pass - I do not believe that...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is prehistoric monument, a world heritage site and a special, sacred landscape with thousands of years of history,secrets and mystery. It is unique and there is still much archaeological...
Read more
-
Loss of view to a WHS and Unesco "landscape without parallel" which links all who pass by to their humanity.
Damage to an incredible archaeological site, with so much more to discover.
-
This is a world heritage site and an iconic British landmark.
This road will more than likely lead to an increase in traffic which will further erode iit and also threaten wildlife .
-
The current plan effectively removes this most important monument entirely from public view, except for those that have the time & money to use the visitor centre. Having already removed one road from...
Read more
-
The proposed tunnel and dual carriageway are positioned partly within the World Heritage Site. This is unsatisfactory. The tunnel should enter from the East as near to the Amesbury roundabout as...
Read more
-
I strongly object to this development because it will cause irreparable damage to an internationally important archeological site.
-
The irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ would destroy this unique piece of British history for current and future...
Read more
-
I have grave concerns about the proposal to build an expressway, A303.
This is an UNESCO World Heritage site and should be treated accordingly. UNESCO Adviers do not approve of this proposal.
I...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned that despite many objections from parties as diverse as Archeologists, Naturalists, Druids and even UNESCO, this plan is apparently being bulldozed through.
It is remarkable -...
Read more
-
I was brought up in Stratford sub Castle, Salisbury and spent much time at Stonehenge. It is our history. Once it has gone, it will never come back. I am in complete opposition to the proposal.
-
To ensure that the needs of non-motorised users (NMUs) are considered both on the route of the A303 and the wider area, and appropriate measures implemented in accordance with HE Cycling Strategy and...
Read more
-
Apart from the obvious fact that stone henge is a national monument which also is held sacred by certain persons in their religious beliefs , and the fact i enjoy driving the 303 i wish to point out...
Read more
-
The proposed scheme will undermine a unique world heritage site whilst increasing traffic, which completely contradicts the UK'S commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. I regularly drive along...
Read more
-
The consultation is something of a farce. My principal interest is the impact the building of the proposed road works and the changes in the landscape after completion will have on the bird life in...
Read more
-
I am primarily concerned by the UNESCO objection to this development. This part of Wiltshire is a designated World Heritage Site for specific reasons and any move which endangers that designation...
Read more
-
I wish to object to the current plans for the Stonehenge site.
The site, of outstanding international importance, is huge. It is not conceivable that we have discovered and identified all there is to...
Read more
-
I hereby assign myself as an Interested Party and that I am opposed to anything happening to this historical and precious site
-
I am concerned about the damage to the archaeology of the wider Stonehenge landscape, including the mesolithic site of Blick Mead. I am concerned that the scheme has been condemned by UNESCO, and how...
Read more
-
As a native of Salisbury Plain (born and lived till 18 in Tilshead) and as a specialist in global megalithic architecture, I object to the massive disruption to the ancient and globally-important...
Read more
-
Stonehenge (and Avebury) is an iconic feature in the British landscape, which I have enjoyed for the past 35years, while driving past it or visiting the site with friends and family.
Altering the...
Read more
-
The significant possibility of further damage to Blick mead preliminary work has already damaged site.
damage to wide area including archaeology and the setting.
I have traveled passed Stonehenge...
Read more
-
I am concerned that there will be irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
Also, UNESCO’s international advisers say the...
Read more
-
People tend to see Stonehenge as just the obvious megaliths, but it is part of a much wider neolithic landscape, which we are just starting to explore and understand, and which could be irreparably...
Read more
-
My representation regards the provisions being made under this road scheme for instances where the act of the construction of this road will result in the removal of an individual's ability to...
Read more
-
I strongly object to any work or disturbance to the sacred Stonehenge monument and surrounding site, I strongly object to the tunnel plans, I would urge the government to read _ think these terrible...
Read more
-
It will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
It will also cause disturbance of rare bird species,...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed A303 expressway past Stonehenge world heritage site, I myself and my children have visited stonehenge many times over the last 40 years and feel that irreparable damage will...
Read more
-
To destroy any part of this unique site would be the act of Philistines and barbarians. We would be worse than those destroying statues and buildings in Syria and the Middle East. Please consider our...
Read more
-
It will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should...
Read more
-
The landscape surrounding Stonehenge is of supreme importance Historically, Archeologically, Educationally and as a Social amenity. To destroy that landscape irreparably by driving a road through it,...
Read more
-
This site is of enormous historical importance. It has already been damaged during preliminary work and if this plan goes forward it is likely to cause far more damage.
Any proposed development must...
Read more
-
It will destroy the sacred heritage of this site.
-
A303 Stonehenge Amesbury to Berwick Down
The Issues – Travel versus Amenity, Values and Assumptions
Stonehenge is unique. It is the highlight of the World Heritage Site (WHS). The A303 runs...
Read more
-
I can't see that just building more and wider roads will relieve congestion. The proposed scheme is completely out of place here.
-
I am surprised that a scheme of this type is even being considered at such a unique and special site & one which has been attracting visitors from all around the globe for many decades. This is a...
Read more
-
I am a British person, so Stonehenge and its surrounding area is part of my own heritage and an heirloom for the future. Stonehenge itself is at risk of damage by the A303 development and would be...
Read more
-
It will cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme...
Read more
-
I object to the A303 Stonehenge proposal because of the serious damage it would inflict on a most important World Heritage Site (WHS).
Much of the damage would be visual: although close to...
Read more
-
I urge you to reconsider this tunnel and road plan. Stonehenge is a world reknowned site of historical interest that brings thousands of tourists into the country every year. We must preserve it...
Read more
-
Concerns about surrounding ancient site and wild life
Loss of view of stones and surrounding landscape and having to pay for any view at all.
Being turned from a place of beauty and wonder, a WHS to...
Read more
-
My objections to the proposed tunnel are concerned primarily with the Portals and the close proximity to sites of Scientific (Archaeology) and Spiritual (Burial Mounds) significance; And to the...
Read more
-
I dont believe that a sufficient number of viable alternative options have been considered in addition to the proposed scheme for the expressway. I think that more time should be spent as there are...
Read more
-
* Roadworkers have already been accused of damaging part of the Stonehenge site as part of the preparation for the tunnel.
* UNESCO said a gunnel would have an adverse impact on the WHS.
* Rare,...
Read more
-
I feel very strongly that the landscape around Stonehenge sheds light on the monument's context and is part of the whole heritage of the world famous earthworks itself.
To build the proposed dual...
Read more
-
I'm concerned about the effect on the monument and of the wildlife conservation n and around the area.
Also I am concerned that the people will not be able to see their monument from the road and...
Read more
-
To tunnel under Stonehenge is a ridiculous idea. The place is steeped in history and you are running the risk of destroying it.
Plus the laylines run there.
-
This scheme will cause irreparable damage to a World Heritage Site.
Stonehenge is not just a NATIONAL TREASURE BUT AN INTERNATIONAL TREASURE, and as such should be protected by any means.
UNESCO...
Read more
-
I am convinced that the proposed road scheme will cause irreparable damage to our leading UK World Heritage site; UNESCO are the experts here and they do not support the scheme, and therefore must be...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I am against the proposals due to the irreparable damage it will cause to the site and to wildlife.
-
I object strongly to the proposed development of the infrastructure surrounding the UNESCO Worl Heritage Site at Stonehenge. This is a dreadful and poorly conceived plan, that will cause huge damage...
Read more
-
I am objecting to the proposals for the A303 Expressway and the impact that it will have on the Stonehenge World Heritage site. New areas of interest within the site are continuing to emerge, such as...
Read more
-
Stonehenge has stood for 1000s of years and is visited by many local people and tourists from all over the world every year and is a World Heritage Site. The construction planned would result in...
Read more
-
This scheme sounds appallingly insensitive. It is especially shocking since this site is probably the most famous WHS in the world, described by UNESCO as a 'landscape without parallel'. Indeed,...
Read more
-
The damage to an important World Heritage Site, in addition to being avoidable, would be irrevocable. It is our duty to preserve and conserve important historical, architectural and archeological...
Read more
-
This site is of huge historical and spiritual significance to thousands of people both locally and internationally building this road would have unbelievable consequences for those that regularly...
Read more
-
I holiday in the south west of England and would lose sight of Stonehenge by the routing suggested. I object most strongly to this. It is the way to start a holiday. Yes the traffic needs attention...
Read more
-
The A303 Expressway is likely to do untold damage to ancient sites and artefacts that are believed to lie in abundance around the Stonehenge area. This is an unacceptable sacrifice of historic remains...
Read more
-
I object to the lack of true consultation regarding the broader landscape aesthetics of this WHO site. There is also a broader issue regarding the wider archaeology of this pre historically important...
Read more
-
I object to the express way as I believe it will cause irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting. I'm also concerned about damage to the Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting...
Read more
-
I object vehemently to the proposal for the A303 at Stonehenge. It has already been stated that the works necessary for completion and the proposed traffic load will cause irreparable damage to this...
Read more
-
i feel this application risks irrepairable damage to Stonehenge and its environs. The surrounding area is vital in providing a context for understanding and appreciating the monument itself. That...
Read more
-
Simply to the the layman the whole stonehenge landscape we are proposing should now be classified as a national park for future generations to experience.
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage site,so it should be left alone,but the damage the road will cause to wildlife and air quality is important,as wildlife numbers are decreasing.
-
I feel that not only is this a complete and utter waste of money, but it will obstruct the view of Stonehenge from the road, which is such a shame as Stonehenge is a historic landmark that should be...
Read more
-
I object to the building of a tunnel near Stonehenge,because it is a timeless national and world heritage site which should not be subject to the whims of the present government policy. The proposal...
Read more
-
I am [redacted]. The current plans to closed all the byways and put in a tunnel will mean I can no longer access Stonehenge at all. I am unable to use the English heritage "accessible" buses, they are...
Read more
-
I wish to add my name to the representations regarding alterations to the area around Stonehenge. The stones are not the only historic artefacts at risk. The surrounding landscape still has much to...
Read more
-
This site was built by OUR ancestors and should be respected, once the road has been built there will be no turning back. Please reconsider and give this site the respect and tranquility away from...
Read more
-
I am a university professor (Exeter), a widely published author (including books on the English seasons and the history of the Union Jack), Hon. President of the Campaign for the Protection of Rural...
Read more
-
I'm frankly aghast that this proposal is even being considered. UNESCO has declared the area a "landscape without parallel". The proposed expressway endangers the habitat of rare species like the...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a sacred site. The proposed works will affect the energy of the land in a very negative way and any underground tunnelling or development should not be permitted.
-
My concerns include:
that the scheme has not taken into consideration other viable options
which would protect the rare bird species including the Stone Curlew.
Increased pollution from faster...
Read more
-
The grounds for my objection are simply that the whole of the Stonehenge environs and their milieu form an ancient 'funerary landscape' which is not limited merely to the Stones themselves but...
Read more
-
Stonehenge has stood for 12,500 years. The internal combustion engine, which is less than 150 years old, relies on fossil fuel which is finite and will probably be exhausted before the motor car...
Read more
-
The A303 Stonehenge project as proposed by Highways England will result in significant and irreversible damage to the Stonehenge cultural landscape including a vast portion of the UNESCO World...
Read more
-
The proposed development does not represent value for money for the public purse, the local topography could easily hide the road from Stonehenge without the need to tunnel and expend vast amounts of...
Read more
-
This is a world-renowned Heritage site which will likely suffer irrepairable damage by the development. This is also a concern of the UNESCO advisers.
It will also mean an increase in noise levels...
Read more
-
The proposed route of the A303 is too close to the Stonehenge World Heritage Site and will cause irreparable damage to the site. UNESCO have advised that the A303 should not go ahead as currently...
Read more
-
I drive the A303 past Stonehenge every time I visit my parents, so I have a vested interest in improving the traffic.
However, I object to the scheme because:
1. I believe it will cause...
Read more
-
Anything threatening to obstruct, dwarf or polloute this WHR is wholly unacceptable. Alternatives must be considered - if not for the WHR then for the rare species like Great Bustard in the vacinity.
-
Irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site. UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form and we all have serious concerns about damage to Blick Mead...
Read more