Filter

The Sizewell C Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 101 to 200 of 1290 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | View 50 results per page | 100

  • Martin Allen

    I am concerned that the impact of the building works over many years (even without the now familiar delays in such schemes) will impact on my enjoyment of the natural wildlife and nature in the area... Read more

  • Mr Alexander Ross

    The design of the reactor(s) building(s) should incorporate my invention for an Emergency Roffing System (UK Patent AWARD GB2526507). Without my invention the reactors will not have the maximum... Read more

  • Alan Manley

    • Noise, air quality and vibration issues of up to 1,250 HGV movements at peak construction on the A12 (that is about one every minute during a peak working day). • The effect of long term pollution... Read more

  • Deptartment of Housing, Planning and Local Government (Deptartment of Housing, Planning and Local Government)

    Dear Sir/Madam, I am registering Ireland as an Interested Party in order to ensure that Ireland is kept informed of progress with this application and the final decision. Regards, Declan Grehan EU &... Read more

  • Clarke and Simpson (Clarke and Simpson) on behalf of Family Mellen (Family Mellen)

    Upon moving to [Redacted] we went to see the initial plans for Sizewell C and were told that our small parcel of land that came with our house and is integral to our future plans, formed part of the... Read more

  • Keith Drew

    I fully understand that this development is of a National need and there will be disruptions for many. My concerns are really about traffic movement for the site being centered so close to the end of... Read more

  • Lesley Krohn

    I object to the building of Sizewell c on these points. 1. The amount of traffic coming and going to the site will be detrimental to the environment and clog up the A12 even though there are by passes... Read more

  • Andrew Kinsella

    Sizewell C will not contribute to net zero until 2040. EDF wants us to pay for £20 billion with a nuclear tax on our energy bills. It’s too slow to help our climate emergency. So why destroy an Area... Read more

  • Joanna Atherton

    I am against the building of SZC because I believe: -it will have a hugely negative impact on the ecology of the area; -more local jobs will be lost than gained due to the negative impact there will... Read more

  • Mr Stephen Dorcey

    Moving to the area 16years ago I did realise that C/D was on the cards Times Change. Sellafield closed in 2014 and the storage of Size well B nuclear waste was foisted upon the community I refuse... Read more

  • Amy Coulter

    I am a resident of East Suffolk writing to you to oppose the construction of a new nuclear power station at Sizewell. Transport I believe the associated congestion and noise and air pollution... Read more

  • David Watson

    I own and manage a caravan and camping park at Darsham. I am concerned with the effect of Sizewell C on the tourism industry in the area. Of particular interest is the proposed park and ride at... Read more

  • Julian A C Royle

    In response to the proposal to build a new Nuclear Power station C at Sizewell I would make the following points in objection 1] Security & Safety A]The involvement of the Chinese Government agency in... Read more

  • Marie Gameson

    I would like to register as an Interested Party. I live less than 100 yards from the Ipswich-Lowestoft railway line and suspect that I (and my neighbours) will be substantially impacted by the plans... Read more

  • Benhall & Sternfield Parish Council (Benhall & Sternfield Parish Council)

    Benhall & Sternfield Parish Council submit the following comments on aspects of the proposed works within our parishes. Fen Meadow, Benhall. Whilst we support the proposed Fen Meadow in Benhall and... Read more

  • Ciarán CUFFE MEP

    Madam/Sir, Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this planning process: As a Member of the European Parliament I wish to raise the following issues: 1. the importance of sharing important... Read more

  • Denise Potter

    The impact on the local area has not been addressed, it has been put forward by people who work in the area, not by people who live in the area and quite clearly this shows on the routes being... Read more

  • Fish Guidance Systems Ltd (Fish Guidance Systems Ltd)

    Fish Guidance Systems (FGS) will be commenting upon the requirement for an Acoustic Fish Deterrent (AFD) that was original proposed by EDF, but subsequently removed from the consultation documents. An... Read more

  • Great Bealings Parish Council (Great Bealings Parish Council)

    Our concerns include: Traffic Environment Cost Suitability

  • John Busby

    I have attended and made presentations to the ONR/NGO forums and its HSE predecessors for over 10 years as the Technical Advisor to Stop Hinkley. I have also made presentations to Sizewell B and its... Read more

  • JP Dorgan

    To Whom it may Concern I am a new resident to Hacheston and live on the main road from Framlingham to the A12. I have grave concerns on the level of traffic that will be increased due to Sizewell and... Read more

  • Caroline Pyke

    This proposed nuclear power station is obsolete technology, environmentally dangerous and unnecessary. It will be making electricity while producing such toxic and dangerous material that we will... Read more

  • Dr Catherine Northover

    I have lived in Suffolk for 42 years. For 34 years I was a local GP. I am very opposed to the building of Sizewell C and these are my main concerns. 1) The building of the power station and the... Read more

  • Ipswich Friends of the Earth (Ipswich Friends of the Earth)

    + Sizewell C is proposed to be situated directly in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The AONB is designated largely for its natural beauty and tranquillity. The main development site would be... Read more

  • James Lewis

    The proposed Sizewell C project should not be in the Suffolk Coast & Heaths AONB (Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty) or on the Suffolk Heritage Coast. I grew up in Colchester and I used to visit this... Read more

  • Angela Lee-Foster

    I wish to raise the following issues of concern about Sizewell C. Need - nuclear power is far more expensive than renewables; Site - too large and impactful for effecting AONB, heritage coast, RSPB... Read more

  • Dominic Adams

    1. Site Selection • I believe it is the right project in the right place • Sizewell C will be built to withstand a 1 in 10,000-year event characterised as sea elevations 6.43m above the present mean... Read more

  • East Suffolk Travel Association (East Suffolk Travel Association)

    Book 6.10, Vol. 9, Chap. 1-12. Our representation is summarised as follows. A full version will be sent before September 30th. We support the rail[-led option. There is need for extra capacity saouth... Read more

  • Farley Family

    1) Concern for our health in the event of a Radioactive material leak into the environment. 2) The project is too close to important wildlife sites. 3) The project is too close to Heritage coast which... Read more

  • Harriet Bowes

    Sizewell C - I am concerned about the fragile coast line, will the construction make erosion worse? How well is the North Sea understood. How will the radio active waste be stored? What about climate... Read more

  • Katy Attwater

    My representation is that:- - The financial model is not robust enough to deliver the project - The contingency for the effects on the design of Climate Change are not appropriate - The proposals for... Read more

  • Lynne Barrett

    I believe that damage to our protected wildlife and their habitats would be so severe that this project should not go ahead. 

  • Peter Allsop

    1. By the time it is built improvements in storage technology and the input from the many wind farms off the North Sea coast will render the project obsolete. 2. The coastline is fragile and has been... Read more

  • Rachel Kellett

    1. Challenging the given cost of Nuclear power. 2012 Hinkley £102 per MW hour / Offshore £39 (on shore even cheaper) 2. Challenging the time it takes to build safely. 12 year plus delays. 3.... Read more

  • Robert Rusack

    I wish the inspectorate to consider the following factors in assessing the validity of the application 1 The impact the development will have on other road users over the development period. 2 The... Read more

  • Trimley St Martin Parish Council (Trimley St Martin Parish Council)

    Trimley St Martin Parish Council note that the freight management facility is intended to be situated off Felixstowe Road in order to facilitate access to the A12. The number of HGVs which may use the... Read more

  • Chris Adelson

    I have been a resident of East Suffolk for over 50 years. These are my objections to the building of Sizewell C. Erosion - I have witnessed the unstable and changing coastline. It is not suitable for... Read more

  • David Adelson

    I have been a resident of East Suffolk for 36 years. I object to the building of a new Nuclear power station at Sizewell on the following grounds. Dangerous site - I have witnessed the unstable and... Read more

  • Debra Hyatt

    it is hard to know where to start. Effects on the landscape of the building work- the new road and the building of accommodation blocks on an area that was forest with the loss the wild life habitat... Read more

  • John Ball

    The points I wish to make in my submission are related to: Site selection Environmental concerns Safety Radioactive hazards Coastal and marine concerns

  • Judie Shore

    I wish to make clear my many concerns about the planning application for the building of Sizewell C Nuclear Power Station. In addition I support the Relevant Representation submitted by Stop Sizewell... Read more

  • Kim Vanhinsbergh

    Please consider these concerns when assessing the application to build two more nuclear reactors at Sizewell. Site location, is it in the wrong place? What effect will building a new power station... Read more

  • Nuclear Consulting Group (NCG) (Nuclear Consulting Group (NCG))

    Accidents are, by definition, accidental There seem no resounding new revelations over the vulnerability of nuclear to unforeseen natural disasters or through human or engineering-based fault... Read more

  • Parish of Friston (Parish of Friston)

    That the proposed development(s) in the parish and surrounding area will alter the character of the district to such an extent that major detrimental changes to life, habitat, usage and income... Read more

  • Prof Peter Dickinson

    WRONG DECISION SIZEWELL C The situation has changed dramatically in view of recent events. It is now obvious that the Chinese input through Huawei and our power stations must be curtailed. Failure to... Read more

  • Rob Piggott

    My submission will focus on the exceptional damage this development will do to this beautiful area of Suffolk. In particular I am concerned with: * transport provision, especially the proposed new... Read more

  • Rupert Wise

    I wish to raise the following issues of concern about Sizewell C. 1. Site Selection I believe it is the wrong project in the wrong place Site at risk from climate change, sea level rise and flooding... Read more

  • Terry Jeffrey

    To comment on tourist and holiday let impact, along with traffic noise. Pollution concerns from the development build and harm to the environment. Loss of income. Health impact, including mental... Read more

  • Andrew Burtenshaw

    I am deeply concerned that EDF has proceeded with submitting this application whilst the country is dealing with a coronavirus epidemic and consider the timing to be totally inappropriate.... Read more

  • Darsham Parish Council (Darsham Parish Council)

    Darsham Parish Council Submission to Planning Inspectorate re EDF's DCO for Sizewell C & D. 1. Introduction and scope of submission. While Darsham Parish Council (DPC) shares the wider concerns about... Read more

  • Heather McConville

    I am deeply concerned that EDF proposals for Sizewell C will severely affect me, and the Marlesford and surrounding community throughout the anticipated 12 year construction period. Despite the fact... Read more

  • Julie Barham

    EDF only propose a two village bypass. The A12 is currently an extremely congested and dangerous road and adding a further 2000 vehicle movements a day for the next ten years is madness. There should... Read more

  • Marie Adams

    I am worried about the consequences of building a nuclear reactor in such a sensitive area. It negatively impinges on sites of special scientific interest and is adjacent to internationally designated... Read more

  • Norfolk County Council (Norfolk County Council)

    Norfolk County Council response to Proposed Sizewell C Project – Submitted DCO Application September 2020 (a) General Comments As the proposed development is located outside of Norfolk within the... Read more

  • Parish Clerk (Parish Clerk ) on behalf of Parham Parish Council (Parham Parish Council )

    We would like to register as an interested party to give us the chance to send a representation, although we do not currently have a representation. -------------------------------------------- Parham... Read more

  • Simon Maier

    I want to raise the following serious issues of deep concern relating to the possibility of Sizewell C. Firstly, the site: 1. It is the wrong project in the wrong place 2. The earmarked site is at... Read more

  • Marc Sidwell

    As a homeowner in Marlesford I am extremely concerned that the impact on our village has been insufficiently considered. EDF rarely even mentions our existence, and yet the Southern Park and Ride will... Read more

  • Peasenhall Parish Council (Peasenhall Parish Council)

    Sizewell C: Relevant Representation Statement by Peasenhall Parish Council If the Sizewell C power station is built, there will be impacts on the parish of Peasenhall during the 10-15 year... Read more

  • Timothy Roberts

    I intend to object in detail on the basis of the huge waste of capital and construction resources this project will entail plus the massive and lengthy disruption we will face across our rural... Read more

  • Amanda Taylor

    I am writing to highlight my major issues of concern about Sizewell C 1. The technology is yet to work anywhere (except perhaps China??) and is already outdated; in the meantime proven green... Read more

  • Butley, Wantisden & Capel St Andrew Parish Council (Butley, Wantisden & Capel St Andrew Parish Council)

    Dear Sirs, RE: THE CONSTRUCTION OF SIZEWELL C The Butley, Capel St Andrew and Wantisden Parish Council has debated the issue of building a significant nuclear power station within eight miles of our... Read more

  • Michael Wade

    My issues of concern for planners to examine regarding Sizewell C: 1. Environmental damage - The site is at risk from sea level rise and flooding particularly in view of climate change and loss of... Read more

  • Mrs Ann SK Mitchem

    As a resident of East Suffolk, a volunteer at Minsmere and at Dunwich museum, I am passionate about this beautiful area of AONB - and an invaluable SSSI. We must protect the species that flourish... Read more

  • Pete Wilkinson

    Amenity The construction of Sizewell C will require the urbanization of a rural area, the wholesale conversion of a tranquil, peaceful area of Suffolk into a building site with the influx of thousands... Read more

  • Peter Etheridge

    The site at Eastbridge is too small for the proposed construction. It is impossible to construct a building of this size without causing environmental damage Will cause a huge noise and light... Read more

  • Suffolk Coast & Heaths Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (Suffolk Coast & Heaths Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty)

    This representation is made on behalf of the Suffolk Coast & Heaths Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) Partnership. The Partnership is made up of around 25 organisations who are committed to... Read more

  • John Pigneguy

    Regarding the widely-acknowledged looming environmental crisis, it is absolutely crucial to make the future as "green" as possible. Wind, solar and tidal power are all "green and clean," unlike... Read more

  • John Richmond

    my representation will include the following areas of concern General - this power station is too large for the national Grid to cope with - EdF have not yet demonstrated a working EPR and are badly... Read more

  • Mrs Susan Eckholdt

    The application misleadingly suggests that there is a need for Sizewell C, yet the claim is a false one. There is no local, county, regional OR national energy production target driving this specific... Read more

  • Susanna Powers

    Sea level rises are almost certain making the siting of Sizewell C extremely dangerous given that there is currently no solution to the problem of nuclear waste which will need to be kept cool for the... Read more

  • Bromeswell Parish Council (Bromeswell Parish Council)

    Bromeswell Parish Council would prefer that we didn’t need to use nuclear power but accepts that there is a need to phase out fossil fuels and that, at this stage a mixture of nuclear & renewables... Read more

  • Greg Walsh

    As a Chartered Engineer, I will be examining safety and environmental aspects of the EDF reactor and infrastructure design, and basing my objections to the development based on these.

  • Hillas Smith

    I object to sizewll C construction on the following grounds, The vast sums of money involved in the project could be better spent on other renewable energy sources eg wind and solar power. The costs... Read more

  • Phillippa Headlam

    This is the Relevant Representation of Phillippa Headlam to the Planning Inspectorate regarding NNB Generation Company (SZC) Limited DCO Application for Sizewell C New Nuclear Power Station and... Read more

  • Sibton Parish Council (Sibton Parish Council)

    Relevant Representation by Sibton Parish Council on the application by EDF to construct Sizewell ‘C’ nuclear power station. We are disappointed that EDF are still not proposing to make full use of the... Read more

  • Stuart Maggs

    The existing application fails to take proper account of the damage to local flora and fauna, the impact of traffic on the local area and the noise and dust pollution that will be suffered by the... Read more

  • Caroline Page County Councillor for Woodbridge

    As elected county councillor for a division affected by this proposed development, I wish to register concern about the development's long-term - in some cases irreparable -effect upon and damage to... Read more

  • Oliver Holloway on behalf of Clarke and Simpson (Clarke and Simpson)

    I write as Agent acting for an on behalf of the majority of Landowners affected by this proposed scheme. Whilst we are having meaningful conversations with EDF's agents we believe a number of our... Read more

  • Hayden Foster on behalf of Clarke and Simpson (Clarke and Simpson)

    I write as Agent acting for an on behalf of the majority of Landowners affected by this proposed scheme. Whilst we are having meaningful conversations with EDF's agents we believe a number of our... Read more

  • Eleanor Havers on behalf of Clarke and Simpson (Clarke and Simpson)

    I write as Agent acting for an on behalf of the majority of Landowners affected by this proposed scheme. Whilst we are having meaningful conversations with EDF's agents we believe a number of our... Read more

  • Corton Parish Council (Corton Parish Council)

    * Consultation method and timing * Use of fresh water * Tourism * Transportation * Pollution * Environment * Outdated and unproven technology * Use of sea water for cooling * Release of waste warm... Read more

  • David Jobson

    The pre-fixed electricity price is far too high I don't like China having a financial interest - look at the problems with China at present, with Hong Kong, Tik Tok, possible involvement in producing... Read more

  • Ian Marshall

    1.Site Selection The UK Government’s 2011/existing National Policy Statement for Nuclear Power Generation EN-6 concludes that Sizewell is a potentially suitable site for new nuclear power stations... Read more

  • Kirsty Logan

    I reject Sizewell C on numerous grounds. Firstly the effect on local environment is appalling. Minsmere is an internationally critical reserve that will not recover from the build. Neither will the... Read more

  • Lorna Burkle

    We live on the B1122 that a large proportion of the traffic to Sizewell will travel along and therefore are concerned about the impact on our property (noise, traffic smells, disruption to the peace... Read more

  • Paul Taylor

    In no particular order: i) I do not believe any argument that the development will benefit the local economy in either the short term or, especially, the long term. Indeed, I feel strongly that the... Read more

  • Robert Lindsay

    Sizewell C no longer makes economic or strategic sense for the country, given that A) we need to reduce carbon emissions to zero by 2030 if we are to have a reasonable chance of keeping warming within... Read more

  • Sharon Head

    At a time of Climate Emergency, this is the wrong project to invest in. It will take 14 years to be operational and by then it will be under threat from rising sea levels. In the process of building,... Read more

  • Simon Lee-Frampton

    I feel that the siting and building of a nuclear power reactor in such close proximity to RSPB Minsmere and the potential effects on the habitat and species living there, especially marsh harriers,... Read more

  • Westleton Parish Council (Westleton Parish Council)

    We [Westleton Parish Council] wish to raise the following issues of concern about Sizewell C. 1. Community, Economic and social impacts • Construction will cause significant environmental, social &... Read more

  • Brigitte D'Angelo

    I am trying to understand the risks of such a project on a coastal site. I want to safeguard the environment for future generations. I understand the need for sustainable energy and potential benefits... Read more

  • Dominic F Douse

    I object to the sizwell c nuclear power project on the grounds that it is unasasery and massively over priced in comparison to more long-term solutions like solar and wind which are cheaper easier and... Read more

  • Edwin Edwards

    I agree with the reservations and issues raised by Suffolk County Council and those submitted by Shut Down Sizewell Campaign and Together Against Sizewell C. My personal objection is based on the... Read more

  • Helga Ballam

    I wish to register my concerns about the proposal to build Sizewell C I believe the site is flawed because of predictions about rising sea levels. It is also adjacent to sites of ecologically... Read more

  • India Bacon

    I wish to make a representation and my concerns centre around: The damage to the local economy that Sizewell C will cause The transport issues that will be created and felt far and wide The... Read more

  • Kier Construction (Kier Construction)

    I work for Kier and am interested in the works considered at Sizewell. Other parts of Kier have been working at Hinkley Point and we would be keen to cross polinate our experience to Sizewell and use... Read more

  • Laura Bonnett

    In the event of an incident at SZB during the construction of SZC, have the plans considered the safe evacuation of the local community to SZB - including those without own transport (e.g. residents... Read more

  • Lynn Eldrett

    Sizewell C is the biggest building project planned in Europe at the moment but there has been scant provision for infrastructure improvements to allow it to happen without destroying the local... Read more

  • Mark Whitby

    The development of the plans for Sizewell C are illustrative of a process of linear design rather than iterative design. The latter being a process that involves on reviewing early decisions in light... Read more

  • Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management (Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management)

    At this stage, we can agree with your conclusion that the construction and commissioning of the new Sizewell C reactor is not likely to have significant adverse consequences for the Netherlands. From... Read more