Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Why haven't Wiltshire cc but traffic lights on longbarrow round about in conjunction with Amesbury round about .no need for a tunnel very simple .
-
I am concerned that unexcavated archaeology within the landscape surrounding Stonehenge may be permanently destroyed theeby removing the best chance that we and future generations have to understood...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’ leading to the possible loss of its WHS status.
UNESCO’s international advisers say...
Read more
-
I am concerned about these changes to such a special and unique site.
The damage that will be done to the Stonehenge landscape, including Blick Mead, does not appear to have been given sufficient...
Read more
-
My main concerns about the project are detailed below.
Firstly, the great risk of permanent damage to the World Heritage Site and its archaeology and setting.
The UNESCO's advisers have...
Read more
-
I am very concerned by the plans for the development of the A303 in Wiltshire. Should such a scheme be completed, it would result in immense environmental damage to the world heritage site of Stone...
Read more
-
J&M TURNER & SON
Manor Farm, Winterbourne Stoke.
DCO Registration of Interested Parties.
We wish to make full written and oral representations on many aspects of the scheme (an outline of the...
Read more
-
This registration is made by : J M Stratton and Co, East Farm, Codford
Summary of Representation:
The proposals seek to create a new restricted byway to connect byway SLAN3 to byway BSJA3A. The...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
-
We need to protect our heritage
-
The plan to build approach road cuttings, flyovers and other elements for a tunnel /expressway through the world heritage site are appalling. Not only will they cause permanent damage to the WHS,...
Read more
-
Please listen to to rejections you have received
I srand by them all.
-
I feel the Western portal is too close to the ancient burial mounds and the Eastern too close to 'Blickmead' Archaeological site, and that there are issues with light pollution to the west and water...
Read more
-
Such a bad idea should never happen
-
Stonehenge is our history. Allowing it to be violated bit by bit enables, eventually, all of our history to be destroyed.
-
I am above all concerned about the potential damage constructing the Stonehenge Tunnel to Neolithic sites not fully excavated yet. Such sites are comparatively rare, and so it would be an act of...
Read more
-
The tunnel will deprive people of the chance to see this world heritage site unless they pay to do so - it’s an extraordinary landmark on the way to the south west. We shouldn’t be making it harder...
Read more
-
The proposed construction would cause irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site.
Many alternative options in that would not damage the World Heritage Site have not been considered or evaluated...
Read more
-
The scheme does not take into account the disturbance it will create for rare bird species such as Great Bustards and Stone Curlews, nor the increase in noise and pollution to the area.
The propsed...
Read more
-
“I OBJECT to this DCO Planning Application."
REASONS FOR OBJECTION
Viability / Judicial Review.
The Treasury, National Infrastructure Commission, Office of Road & Rail and National Audit...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to a World Heritage and UNESCO site including Blick Mead,which UNESCO say shouldn’t go ahead in its form. Disturbance of rare bird species. Increased faster traffic and noise.
-
I am a retired Councillor and former Mayor of Wilton. I was a councillor for 60 years and have witnessed all of the previous applications and discussions relating to Stonehenge.
I wish to object to...
Read more
-
This is a historical site, and this damage would be irreparable. Once it has been done it cannot be undone. This would be tragic.
-
While I recognise that the 303 is an important traffic corridor to the SW of England (which I avoid as much as possible), this attempted solution does not seem to be proceeding with due consideration...
Read more
-
I support, in general terms, the scheme as submitted. The issue of congestion on this major trunk road in the vicinity of the World Heritage Site has long vexed decision makers and whilst the...
Read more
-
This will cause irreparable damage to a site of national and global importance. We don't know what's under this site and should respect it's history and those for whom it still has spiritual...
Read more
-
Over several millenia and certainly the last century millions of people have passed by Stonehenge and held in awe at its mystique and pondered it's significance. It is one of the most enchanting views...
Read more
-
My feeling is that the tunnel is too short & compromises the criteria of a World Heritage Site. This weakens our authority when it comes to commenting on the infringements of other countries. We...
Read more
-
I object because this is a world heritage site of unequal historical interest as is the land around it. Plus the wildlife and nature in the area would be affected. As a UK tax payer I also object to...
Read more
-
I am very concerned a bout the effect this will have on the archaeological impact on the area.
-
I cannot believe that such a significant Historic site, not only in Britain but to the whole world, is subject to yet another missguided and shortsighted attempt to address road congestion. Have...
Read more
-
I am a retired teacher with family in Cornwall so I've used the 303 regularly for many years. I am not a Druid,hippie,traveller or pagan but have found Stonehenge to be a very welcome sight on my...
Read more
-
For generations my family have farmed the land destined for the western portal and its associated 1 km cutting for the A303. I have been brought up knowing my guardian responsibilities towards the...
Read more
-
I object to the tunnel project, which threatens a UNESCO World Heritage Site of immense significant for British cultural heritage. There is no comparable site in Britain. Even if construction is...
Read more
-
I feel if this went ahead it would severely damage the water table and wild life surrounding Stone henge, it’s a sacred site of great heritage of our ancestors which need protection from money making...
Read more
-
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its...
Read more
-
The plan would cause untold damage to this most important national monument and the surrounding area.
UNESCO are opposed to the proposal as it stands.
Blick Head could be irreparably damaged.
There...
Read more
-
Stonehendge is world heritage site. To build a tunnel underneath it is expensive and pointless. There is ample space to provide the widening of other existing roads. The world heritage status is...
Read more
-
Want to maintain Stonehenge as a tourist/ special interest area and not a motorway bye pass please do not proceed with development.
-
I wish to oppose major structural changes to the landscape of Stonehenge, I feel very strongly about this.
-
I am strongly opposed to this scheme which I believe will cause unacceptable damage to Blick Mead in particular and the greater Stonehenge landscape WHS in general.
-
Our archaeological heritage is precious and unique. I support plans for a better road, but not one which has such wanton disregard for the unseen treasures in this remarkable area; once they are...
Read more
-
I object to this proposal in the strongest terms as it is not needed, is a huge waste of public money, and will destroy an extremely important part of our national heritage and a World Heritage Site
-
Irreparable damage and destruction to an internationally important heritage site and entire landscape with no equal or comparable area anywhere in the world.
Significant destruction of natural...
Read more
-
While understanding the desire to stop the intrusion of traffic noise and pollution into the site of Stonehenge, I object to the plans currently proposed.
We have a responsibility to protect the...
Read more
-
I am concerned with the building of a tunnel.under such a precious and historical site. I am concerned with the environmental impact of it on the local area. I wish to be registered as an interested...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is noir just the stones, marvellous though they are. It is the whole surrounding landscape.
Discoveries are still being made, and it is extremely likely that as our understanding grows,...
Read more
-
Objection to the proposed planning application.
-
Blick Mead & locale: unique archaeological value. Numerous 'firsts' attributed to site; first contact btw. Mesolithic hunters and Neolithic farmers, thus evidencing huge significance to siting of...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the Stonehenge World Heritage Site and its archaeology
Disturbance of rare bird species eg Stone Curlew and Great Bustard
-
I object to the closure of the Drove because it makes the Stonehenge landscape inaccessable for the disabled and infirm, especially important during the main festivals of the pagan calender. I object...
Read more
-
The proposed work will cause irreparable damage to a World Heritage Site.
-
Nothing at the moment. I am just registering.
-
I am concerned over irreparable damage to the site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
The UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should...
Read more
-
I am a druid as well as a spiritual person and my belief is grounded in my and humanity's connection with mother earth or Gaia which is one organism which we can not exist without. gaia has been...
Read more
-
I object to the enormous damage that will be done to a unique and important historical site.
-
This construction work will cause significant damage to the archeology and context of this important World Heritage Site (WHS). UNESCO have already advised that this construction scheme should not...
Read more
-
Stone henge is a unique and ancient monument, unparalleled in significance, and its protection deserves greater priority than whether traffic flows smoothly on the nearby A303.
When I drive to Devon...
Read more
-
The documents used to provide evidence for the submission appear to contain discrepancies whose effect is to reduce the benefit of the project and potentially make it fall outside National Policy...
Read more
-
I am only a history student a US college, but it pains me that anything, anywhere, of historical value - much less Stonehenge - could be damaged irreparably for the sake of ease or progress. Let...
Read more
-
“I OBJECT to this DCO Planning Application."
REASONS FOR OBJECTION
Viability / Judicial Review.
The Treasury, National Infrastructure Commission, Office of Road & Rail and National Audit...
Read more
-
i object to a tunnel being built under Stonhenge This is an ancient important site and the tunnel will chnage its energy and weaken the earth
-
I a appalled that the UK Goverment can even contemplate this road and tunnel proposal which will adversely effect the iconic Stonehenge landscape. What kind of message does this send out about Britain...
Read more
-
The current plan has too many disadvantages (disturbing archeological sites and wildlife, too noisy, making it only possible to see the stones if you pay)
Other realistic options should be developed...
Read more
-
As an Archaeologist and a concerned member of the public, I see 'no case' that would justify the permanent alteration and damage to the nationally and internationally iconic and heritage rich...
Read more
-
I'm objecting because I disagree with the inevitable irreversible damage which would occur to the land in the area. It's a unique setting of immense archaeological value and a hugely important part...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the destruction of yet undiscovered archaeology within this very special landscape.
-
This is one of the most important sites in our country and the world. We should be doing all we can to protect it not try and destroy it. We are merely custodians and we must not fail in our duty.
-
The monument that is Stonehenge is unique. There's nothing like it in the rest of the world.
I understand that the section of A303 running past it is always a bottleneck, and that is inconvenient....
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an ancient site and loss of this from public view from the existing road excludes all those who do not have the resources to pay to see it. The road itself is a part of the existing...
Read more
-
I am extremely concerned about the proposed expressway, given the importance of the Stonehenge World Heritage Site to the history and culture of the United Kingdom. UNESCO's international advisers...
Read more
-
I object strongly to the building of the building of a Stonehenge tunnel. There are viable, cheaper to build, alternative road improvement routes available that would not cause irreparable damage to...
Read more
-
Stone henge is a sacred site and should be left alone, not to mention disruptions to.local businesses & wildlife
-
It is a historical site, with so much more to learn. Do no destroy it.
-
I am against this proposal
-
This is a world heritage site and deserves to be preserved for generations to come. Building a tunnel under the site will disturb natural wildlife, have potentially damaging consequences to the site...
Read more
-
As a farmer and landowner in the Stonehenge WHS, south of Stonehenge I have grave concerns over the tunnel scheme.
1. I believe the scheme will have a negative impact on the quality and quantity of...
Read more
-
I object to the destruction of the landscape around one of the country's most significant landmarks.
-
I believe the current plan will cause too much damage to the archaeological record at Britain’s most important historical site.
-
To whom it may concern,
I am concerned about the A303 tunnel construction plans at Stonehenge for the following reasons:
- UNESCO has not approved of the tunnel plan in its current form
- 10...
Read more
-
WHY ARE YOU BUILDING UNDERNEATH A TUNNEL STONEHENGE IS A NATIONAL TREASURE WE HAVENT A LOT TO BE PROUD OFF BUT THIS WE ARE. MY SELF I DONT UNDERSTAND CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS 3 CAN SEE IT AND GO MUMMY...
Read more
-
I am totally opposed to the proposed road and tunnel construction at Stonehenge, one of the world’s most important ancient monuments. This plan is opposed by historians, archaeologists, and even...
Read more
-
These are my issues shared by many who visit stonehenge or talk about it to visitors and friends
*Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
*UNESCO's advisers say...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form. Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site...
Read more
-
Please do NOT do aqnything that will affect Stonehenge in any way. This is such an important place, to people all over the world.
-
I feel that the developemnt will destroy an internationally important Landscape and cause irreversible destruction. Therefore I would suggest stopping this process and changing the route proposed to...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a unique and invaluable part of the fabric of this country. Given expert opinion (from as respected a body as UNESCO) that these plans will cause irreversible damage to this site, not to...
Read more
-
Remembering visits to Stonehenge some 60 years ago when one could park by the roadside and wander round the stones in peace I deplore the potential noise and intrusion of extra traffic on the...
Read more
-
I OBJECT to this planning proposition because it will disturb an ancient site that is still sacred to, and used by, Pagan worshippers to this day.
It will also be likely to disturb a great deal of...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is arguably our greatest national treasure and must be protected at all costs.
-
It will ruin immense amounts of archaeology and change the landscape forever.
It will take away the joy of seeing the Stones on the skyline when passing and feeling a connection to them and the...
Read more
-
I do not think the proposed development should be allowed to take place, for the following reasons:
* Stonehenge, a world heritage site, will be irreparably damaged, and its importance as a British...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the impact on our national treasure of stonehenge both visually and its structual integrity.
-
Stonehenge is a precious treasure at the heart of a sacred stone age landscape. Its historic and current setting functions in helping people worldwide, from toddlers to centenarians, to better...
Read more
-
As a concerned member of the British public, I do not think sufficient provisions are made in this application to protect out ancient and historical heritage from damage. The damage may be accidental...
Read more
-
A tunnel under Stonehenge could damage the site, it could destroy ancient archeology. A wider range of routes should be reassessed. The U.K’s reputation for protecting ancient heritage will be...
Read more
-
I feel the proposed infrastructure changes would compromise the integrity of Stonehenge and I am greatly opposed to them. Please reconsider in the interests of heritage
-
Stonehenge sits in a unique and highly sensitive landscape that's already under intense pressure from traffic, tourism and economic development.
Digging a tunnel would undoubtedly involve destroying...
Read more
-
The flyover at Countess roundabout will adversely affect the local walk along the river Avon below Lord's Walk in Amesbury. The flyover will follow nearly all of the river walk and really ruin it. ...
Read more